Marcella Navarrete et al v. Jessie Arana et al

Filing 25

JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL by Judge Percy Anderson, It is therefore now ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that defendants Jessie Arana, Chris Stevens, and Michelle King shall have judgment in their favor against Plaintiffs that this action is dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiffs take nothing and that Defendants shall have their costs of suit 24 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (pj)

Download PDF
1 JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 MARCELLA NAVARRETE and JOSE CASTANEDA, JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL v. 14 16 CV 16-1230 PA (AFMx) Plaintiffs, 13 15 No. JESSIE ARANA, CHRIS STEVENS, and MICHELLE KING Defendants. 17 18 19 In accordance with the Court’s June 6, 2016 Minute Order dismissing the First 20 Amended Complaint filed by plaintiffs Marcella Navarrete and Jose Castaneda (collectively 21 “Plaintiffs”) without leave to amend and dismissing the action with prejudice; It is therefore now ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that defendants Jessie 22 23 Arana, Chris Stevens, and Michelle King (collectively “Defendants”) shall have judgment in 24 their favor against Plaintiffs. It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this action is dismissed 25 26 with prejudice. 27 // 28 // 1 2 It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Plaintiffs take nothing and that Defendants shall have their costs of suit. 3 4 DATED: June 2, 2016 _________________________________ Percy Anderson United States District Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?