Marcella Navarrete et al v. Jessie Arana et al
Filing
25
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL by Judge Percy Anderson, It is therefore now ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that defendants Jessie Arana, Chris Stevens, and Michelle King shall have judgment in their favor against Plaintiffs that this action is dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiffs take nothing and that Defendants shall have their costs of suit 24 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (pj)
1
JS-6
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
MARCELLA NAVARRETE and JOSE
CASTANEDA,
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL
v.
14
16
CV 16-1230 PA (AFMx)
Plaintiffs,
13
15
No.
JESSIE ARANA, CHRIS STEVENS, and
MICHELLE KING
Defendants.
17
18
19
In accordance with the Court’s June 6, 2016 Minute Order dismissing the First
20
Amended Complaint filed by plaintiffs Marcella Navarrete and Jose Castaneda (collectively
21
“Plaintiffs”) without leave to amend and dismissing the action with prejudice;
It is therefore now ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that defendants Jessie
22
23
Arana, Chris Stevens, and Michelle King (collectively “Defendants”) shall have judgment in
24
their favor against Plaintiffs.
It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this action is dismissed
25
26
with prejudice.
27
//
28
//
1
2
It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Plaintiffs take nothing
and that Defendants shall have their costs of suit.
3
4
DATED: June 2, 2016
_________________________________
Percy Anderson
United States District Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?