Antoine P. LeBlanc v. C. Wu et al
Filing
38
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Josephine L. Staton for Report and Recommendation 36 : The pending motion to dismiss 32 is denied in part and granted, in part, and the claims against all defendants in their official capacity are dismissed with prejudice; and defendants Wu and Morris are shall file an answer to the First Amended Complaint within 30 days of the Order. (ib)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
ANTOINE P. LeBLANC,
11
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
C. WU, et al.,
Case No. CV 17-01367 JLS (AFM)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
JUDGE
14
Defendants.
15
16
17
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636, the Court has reviewed the Report and
18
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Report
19
have been filed herein. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the
20
Magistrate Judge.
21
IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that
22
(1)
23
the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is accepted
and adopted;
24
(2)
the pending motion to dismiss is denied, in part (ECF No. 32);
25
(3)
the motion to dismiss is granted, in part, and the claims against all
26
defendants in their official capacity are dismissed with prejudice; and
27
///
28
///
1
2
(4)
defendants Wu and Morris are ordered to file an answer to the First
Amended Complaint within thirty days of the Order.
3
4
DATED: May 3, 2017
5
6
7
____________________________________
JOSEPHINE L. STATON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?