Antoine P. LeBlanc v. C. Wu et al

Filing 38

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Josephine L. Staton for Report and Recommendation 36 : The pending motion to dismiss 32 is denied in part and granted, in part, and the claims against all defendants in their official capacity are dismissed with prejudice; and defendants Wu and Morris are shall file an answer to the First Amended Complaint within 30 days of the Order. (ib)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 ANTOINE P. LeBLANC, 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 C. WU, et al., Case No. CV 17-01367 JLS (AFM) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636, the Court has reviewed the Report and 18 Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Report 19 have been filed herein. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the 20 Magistrate Judge. 21 IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that 22 (1) 23 the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is accepted and adopted; 24 (2) the pending motion to dismiss is denied, in part (ECF No. 32); 25 (3) the motion to dismiss is granted, in part, and the claims against all 26 defendants in their official capacity are dismissed with prejudice; and 27 /// 28 /// 1 2 (4) defendants Wu and Morris are ordered to file an answer to the First Amended Complaint within thirty days of the Order. 3 4 DATED: May 3, 2017 5 6 7 ____________________________________ JOSEPHINE L. STATON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?