Lucidus Tech Co v. EKO Development Limited et al
Filing
49
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE by Judge John A. Kronstadt, Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (pso)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
) CASE NO. 16-CV-01531 JAK (JEMx)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
) ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH
) PREJUDICE JS-6
vs.
)
)
)
EKO DEVELOPMENT LIMITED, a )
China Company, and Does 1 through )
20, inclusive,
)
)
)
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
LUCIDUS TECH CO, a California
corporation,
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Case No. 16-CV-01531 JAK (JEMx)
1
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Plaintiff Lucidus Tech Co and defendant EKO Development Ltd.
(collectively, the “Parties”) have entered into a confidential settlement agreement
(“Agreement”) to resolve this action. The Parties stipulated to request the Court to
sequentially reopen the case, retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement,
and then dismiss the case with prejudice. The Court has already signed orders to
(a) reopen the case, and (b) retain jurisdiction.
Therefore, the Court hereby dismisses this case WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12
Dated: March 28, 2017
13
__________________________
HON. JOHN A. KRONSTADT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No. 16-CV-01531 JAK (JEMx)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?