Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership v. City of Los Angeles, California

Filing 24

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: On July 15, 2016, the Court issued a writ ordering the City of Los Angeles to set aside [its] decision in connection with Case No. ZA-2014-1239-CUW; ENV- 2014-1240-MND and hold a further administrative hearing in connection with Petitioners project. (ECF No. 18.) The writ was returned on October 14, 2016. (ECF No. 22.) It appears that the City of Los Angeles has complied with the terms of the writ. The Court now issues this order to show cause why this case should not be dismissed. If neither party objects in writing on or before November 14, 2016, the Court shall terminate this case. (lc). Modified on 11/2/2016 (lc).

Download PDF
1 O 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 United States District Court Central District of California 9 10 11 12 13 14 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a California limited partnership dba VERIZON WIRELESS, Plaintiff and Petitioner, 15 v. 16 17 Case No. 2:16-CV-1654-ODW(AJW) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant and Respondent. 18 19 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 On July 15, 2016, the Court issued a writ ordering the City of Los Angeles to 2 “set aside [its] decision in connection with Case No. ZA-2014-1239-CUW; ENV- 3 2014-1240-MND and hold a further administrative hearing in connection with 4 Petitioner’s project.” (ECF No. 18.) The writ was returned on October 14, 2016. 5 (ECF No. 22.) It appears that the City of Los Angeles has complied with the terms of 6 the writ. The Court now issues this order to show cause why this case should not be 7 dismissed. If neither party objects in writing on or before November 14, 2016, the 8 Court shall terminate this case. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 November 2, 2016 12 13 14 ____________________________________ OTIS D. WRIGHT, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?