Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership v. City of Los Angeles, California
Filing
24
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: On July 15, 2016, the Court issued a writ ordering the City of Los Angeles to set aside [its] decision in connection with Case No. ZA-2014-1239-CUW; ENV- 2014-1240-MND and hold a further administrative hearing in connection with Petitioners project. (ECF No. 18.) The writ was returned on October 14, 2016. (ECF No. 22.) It appears that the City of Los Angeles has complied with the terms of the writ. The Court now issues this order to show cause why this case should not be dismissed. If neither party objects in writing on or before November 14, 2016, the Court shall terminate this case. (lc). Modified on 11/2/2016 (lc).
1
O
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
United States District Court
Central District of California
9
10
11
12
13
14
LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP, a California limited
partnership dba VERIZON WIRELESS,
Plaintiff and Petitioner,
15
v.
16
17
Case No. 2:16-CV-1654-ODW(AJW)
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
CITY OF LOS ANGELES,
Defendant and Respondent.
18
19
20
///
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
On July 15, 2016, the Court issued a writ ordering the City of Los Angeles to
2
“set aside [its] decision in connection with Case No. ZA-2014-1239-CUW; ENV-
3
2014-1240-MND and hold a further administrative hearing in connection with
4
Petitioner’s project.” (ECF No. 18.) The writ was returned on October 14, 2016.
5
(ECF No. 22.) It appears that the City of Los Angeles has complied with the terms of
6
the writ. The Court now issues this order to show cause why this case should not be
7
dismissed. If neither party objects in writing on or before November 14, 2016, the
8
Court shall terminate this case.
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
November 2, 2016
12
13
14
____________________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?