Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership v. City of Los Angeles, California
Filing
25
ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: On July 15, 2016, the Court issued a writ ordering the City of Los Angeles to set aside [its] decision in connection with Case No. ZA-2014-1239-CUW; ENV-2014-1240-MND and hold a further administr ative hearing in connection with Petitioners project. (ECF No. 18.) The writ was returned on October 14, 2016. (ECF No. 22.) It appears that the City of Los Angeles has complied with the terms ofthe writ. The Court issued an order to show cause on November 2, 2016 indicatingthat this matter would be dismissed if neither party objected in writing on or before November 14, 2016. Neither party filed an objection by that date. Therefore, the Court dismisses this action. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (vv)
1
JS-6
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
United States District Court
Central District of California
9
10
11
12
13
14
LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP, a California limited
partnership dba VERIZON WIRELESS,
Plaintiff and Petitioner,
15
v.
16
17
Case No. 2:16-CV-1654-ODW(AJW)
ORDER DISMISSING CASE
CITY OF LOS ANGELES,
Defendant and Respondent.
18
19
20
///
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
On July 15, 2016, the Court issued a writ ordering the City of Los Angeles to
2
“set aside [its] decision in connection with Case No. ZA-2014-1239-CUW; ENV-
3
2014-1240-MND and hold a further administrative hearing in connection with
4
Petitioner’s project.” (ECF No. 18.) The writ was returned on October 14, 2016.
5
(ECF No. 22.) It appears that the City of Los Angeles has complied with the terms of
6
the writ. The Court issued an order to show cause on November 2, 2016 indicating
7
that this matter would be dismissed if neither party objected in writing on or before
8
November 14, 2016. Neither party filed an objection by that date. Therefore, the
9
Court dismisses this action.
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
November 17, 2016
13
14
15
____________________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?