John R Fuchs et al v. State Farm General Insurance Company

Filing 177

JUDGMENT RE DEFENDANT STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY'S REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR LEAVE TO FILE A RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 175 by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs take nothing from defendant State Farm, with respect to Plaintiffs' complaint, and judgment is entered in favor of defendant State Farm on all claims for relief. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jp)

Download PDF
JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 JOHN R. FUCHS, an individual, and ROBYN R. FUCHS, an individual; [State Court Case No. SC125394, Filed February 11, 2016] Plaintiffs, 13 14 CASE NO. 2:16-cv-01844-BRO-GJS v. 16 17 JUDGMENT RE DEFENDANT STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY’S REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR LEAVE TO FILE A RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois corporation; and Does 1 through 50, Inclusive, Defendants. 15 18 19 20 21 22 The motion/request of defendant State Farm General Insurance Company 23 (“State Farm”) for entry of judgment, or, in the alternative, for leave to file a renewed 24 motion for summary judgment is hereby GRANTED. 25 On January 3, 2017, this Court ruled that State Farm is entitled to partial 26 summary judgment with respect to: (1) the Mold Remediation Expense, Laundry 27 Room Expense, Supervision Expense, the cost to repair to the damaged shear wall, 28 Plaintiffs John R. Fuchs and Robyn R. Fuchs’ (“Plaintiffs”) emotional distress -1- LEGAL\31531024\1 1 expenses, and Robyn Fuchs’ medical expenses; (2) Plaintiffs’ second cause of action 2 for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing; and, (3) Plaintiffs’ 3 request for punitive damages. Accordingly, only Plaintiffs’ breach of contract claim 4 premised upon the Furniture Expense, Electronics Expense, Water Heater Expense, 5 Hardwood Expense, and Alternative Living Expense remained for adjudication. On 6 April 27, 2017, this Court granted State Farm’s Motion to Modify and Confirm the 7 Appraisal Award. 8 After consideration of the admissible evidence, all documents and papers filed 9 in this case, and this Court’s prior Orders, the Court hereby finds that there is no 10 genuine issue as to any material fact and State Farm is entitled to judgment as a 11 matter of law with respect to all causes of action, as follows: 12 1. There is no genuine issue as to any material fact and defendant State 13 Farm is entitled to judgment as a matter of law with respect to Plaintiffs’ first claim 14 for relief for breach of contract. 15 2. There is no genuine issue as to any material fact and defendant State 16 Farm is entitled to judgment as a matter of law with respect to Plaintiffs’ second 17 claim for relief for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. 18 3. There is no genuine issue as to any material fact and defendant State 19 Farm is entitled to judgment as a matter of law with respect to Plaintiffs’ claim for 20 punitive damages. 21 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs take nothing 22 from defendant State Farm, with respect to Plaintiffs’ complaint, and judgment is 23 entered in favor of defendant State Farm on all claims for relief. 24 25 26 27 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: July 12, 2017 ___________________________ HON. BEVERLY REID O’CONNELL United States District Judge 28 -2LEGAL\31531024\1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?