John Piccarreto v. Presstek, LLC et al
Filing
74
JUDGMENT by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (See order for details.) (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (kti)
1
2
3
JS-6
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOHN PICCARRETO,
Plaintiffs,
12
13
14
15
16
17
v.
PRESSTEK, LLC,
Defendant.
)
) Case No. CV 16-1862 DMG (JCx)
)
)
) JUDGMENT
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1-
1
This matter having come before the Court for a jury trial on February 21, 2017
2
through February 24, 2017 and a subsequent court trial [Doc. ## 65, 66, 67], and the
3
jury’s verdict having been rendered on the jury trial [Doc. # 52] and this Court having
4
filed its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as to the court trial,
5
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiff John
6
Piccarreto shall have and recover from Defendant Presstek, LLC the following amounts:
7
8
1. Damages for violation of Cal. Lab. Code § 970
9
and for intentional misrepresentation (comprised of
10
$59,882.00 for economic damages and $25,000.00
11
for non-economic damages)
$ 84,882.00
12
2. Double damages pursuant to Cal. Lab. Code § 972
13
3. Vacation pay under Cal. Lab. Code § 227.3
14
4. Commissions and civil penalties under
15
Cal. Lab. Code §§ 201, 203
84,882.00
463.03
8,972.06
16
5. Civil penalty under Cal. Lab. Code §§ 226, 226.3
17
6. Civil Penalties under the Private Attorney General Act
18
California Labor Code Section 2698 et seq.
250.00
2,200.00
19
20
For a total Judgment of
$181,649.09
21
22
23
DATED: August 24, 2017
24
25
DOLLY M. GEE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?