John Piccarreto v. Presstek, LLC et al

Filing 74

JUDGMENT by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (See order for details.) (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (kti)

Download PDF
1 2 3 JS-6 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN PICCARRETO, Plaintiffs, 12 13 14 15 16 17 v. PRESSTEK, LLC, Defendant. ) ) Case No. CV 16-1862 DMG (JCx) ) ) ) JUDGMENT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1- 1 This matter having come before the Court for a jury trial on February 21, 2017 2 through February 24, 2017 and a subsequent court trial [Doc. ## 65, 66, 67], and the 3 jury’s verdict having been rendered on the jury trial [Doc. # 52] and this Court having 4 filed its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as to the court trial, 5 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiff John 6 Piccarreto shall have and recover from Defendant Presstek, LLC the following amounts: 7 8 1. Damages for violation of Cal. Lab. Code § 970 9 and for intentional misrepresentation (comprised of 10 $59,882.00 for economic damages and $25,000.00 11 for non-economic damages) $ 84,882.00 12 2. Double damages pursuant to Cal. Lab. Code § 972 13 3. Vacation pay under Cal. Lab. Code § 227.3 14 4. Commissions and civil penalties under 15 Cal. Lab. Code §§ 201, 203 84,882.00 463.03 8,972.06 16 5. Civil penalty under Cal. Lab. Code §§ 226, 226.3 17 6. Civil Penalties under the Private Attorney General Act 18 California Labor Code Section 2698 et seq. 250.00 2,200.00 19 20 For a total Judgment of $181,649.09 21 22 23 DATED: August 24, 2017 24 25 DOLLY M. GEE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?