Thomas Atencio et al v. Tunecore, Inc. et al

Filing 196

JUDGMENT ON THE VERDICT FOR THE PLAINTIFFS by Clerk: This action came on for jury trial, the Honorable Dolly M. Gee, District Judge, presiding, and the issues having been duly tried and the jury having duly rendered its verdict, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJ UDGED that the plaintiff Thomas Atencio recover of the defendant Tunecore, Inc.: $49,103.36, plus prejudgment interest at the rate of 9% per annum from 6/1/2015 pursuant to N.Y.C.P.L.R. Sections 5001(b), 5004, and costs of action. IT IS ORD ERED AND ADJUDGED that the plaintiff Gian Caterine recover of the defendant Tunecore, Inc.: $196,816.68, plus prejudgment interest at the rate of 9% per annum from 6/1/2015 pursuant to N.Y.C.P.L.R. Sections 5001(b), 5004, and costs of action. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NUMBER Thomas Atencio, et al., PLAINTIFF(S) CV 16-1925-DMG (MRWx) v. Tunecore, Inc., et al., DEFENDANT(S). JUDGMENT ON THE VERDICT FOR THE PLAINTIFFS This action came on for jury trial, the Honorable Dolly M. Gee, District Judge, presiding, and the issues having been duly tried and the jury having duly rendered its verdict, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the plaintiff Thomas Atencio recover of the defendant Tunecore, Inc.: $49,103.36, plus prejudgment interest at the rate of 9% per annum from June 1, 2015 pursuant to N.Y.C.P.L.R. §§ 5001(b), 5004, and costs of action. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the plaintiff Gian Caterine recover of the defendant Tunecore, Inc.: $196,816.68, plus prejudgment interest at the rate of 9% per annum from June 1, 2015 pursuant to N.Y.C.P.L.R. §§ 5001(b), 5004, and costs of action. Clerk, U. S. District Court Dated: December 11, 2018 By: Kane Tien Deputy Clerk cc: Counsel of record CV-49 (05/98) JUDGMENT ON THE VERDICT FOR THE PLAINTIFF(S)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?