Dana Fewell et al v. State of California et al

Filing 66

JUDGMENT by Judge Dale S. Fischer. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants State of California, California Highway Patrol, and Officer Martin Sanchez. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ah)

Download PDF
1 JS 6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 DANA FEWELL, individually and as Successor in Interest to WELDON PATTERSON FEWELL, deceased; NOLAN FEWELL, individually and as Successor in Interest to WELDON PATTERSON FEWELL, deceased; and KAREN SIFFERT, individually, Case No. 2:16-cv-01934 DSF (JEMx) JUDGMENT Plaintiff, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA; CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL; COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA; OFFICER MARTIN SANCHEZ, an individual; DEPUTY GREG SORENSON, an individual; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants. 23 24 The Motion of Defendants State of California, California Highway Patrol, and 25 Officer Martin Sanchez for Summary Judgment, or, in the Alternative, Partial 26 Summary Judgment, came on regularly for hearing before this Court on March 27, 27 2017. Donna M. Dean appeared for Defendants and moving parties. Brian T. Dunn 28 and Jennifer A. Bandlow appeared for Plaintiffs. 1 1 After considering the moving and opposition papers, and having concluded 2 that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact with respect to any of the 3 Plaintiffs’ claims for relief against Defendants, 4 IT IS ORDERED that judgment be entered in favor of Defendants State of 5 California, California Highway Patrol, and Officer Martin Sanchez. 6 4/11/17 Dated: _________________________ 7 __________________________ Dale S. Fischer, Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?