Dana Fewell et al v. State of California et al
Filing
66
JUDGMENT by Judge Dale S. Fischer. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants State of California, California Highway Patrol, and Officer Martin Sanchez. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ah)
1
JS 6
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
DANA FEWELL, individually and as
Successor in Interest to WELDON
PATTERSON FEWELL, deceased;
NOLAN FEWELL, individually and
as Successor in Interest to WELDON
PATTERSON FEWELL, deceased;
and KAREN SIFFERT, individually,
Case No. 2:16-cv-01934 DSF (JEMx)
JUDGMENT
Plaintiff,
v.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA;
CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY
PATROL; COUNTY OF SANTA
BARBARA; OFFICER MARTIN
SANCHEZ, an individual; DEPUTY
GREG SORENSON, an individual;
and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,
Defendants.
23
24
The Motion of Defendants State of California, California Highway Patrol, and
25
Officer Martin Sanchez for Summary Judgment, or, in the Alternative, Partial
26
Summary Judgment, came on regularly for hearing before this Court on March 27,
27
2017. Donna M. Dean appeared for Defendants and moving parties. Brian T. Dunn
28
and Jennifer A. Bandlow appeared for Plaintiffs.
1
1
After considering the moving and opposition papers, and having concluded
2
that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact with respect to any of the
3
Plaintiffs’ claims for relief against Defendants,
4
IT IS ORDERED that judgment be entered in favor of Defendants State of
5
California, California Highway Patrol, and Officer Martin Sanchez.
6
4/11/17
Dated: _________________________
7
__________________________
Dale S. Fischer, Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?