Pablo Duran et al v. World Savings Bank FSB et al

Filing 22

JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL by Judge S. James Otero:The Complaint is dismissed, as to all causes of action, with prejudice; 2. Judgment is entered in favor of defendants WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. and GOLDEN WEST SAVINGS ASSOCIATION SERVICE CO.; and 3. Plaintiffs, Pablo Duran and Maria Duran will recover nothing in thisaction from defendants WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. and GOLDEN WEST SAVINGS ASSOCIATION SERVICE CO. (lc)

Download PDF
1 2 May 4, 2016. 3 VC P 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION 10 CASE NO.: 2:16-cv-01938-SJO-GJS 11 PABLO DURAN, an individual; MARIA DURAN, an individual; 12 13 14 JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL Plaintiff, [Assigned to the Hon. S. James Otero] v. 15 WORLD SAVINGS BANK, FSB dba FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK; WELLS 17 FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION; GOLDEN WEST 18 SAVINGS ASSOCIATION SERVICE 19 CO.; and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive; 16 20 Defendants. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 93000/FR1871/01404124-1 1 CASE NO.: 2:16-CV-01938-SJO-GJS [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL 1 On April 29, 2016, the Court entered an Order granting the Motion to 2 Dismiss Complaint, filed by defendants WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., successor 3 by merger with Wells Fargo Bank Southwest, N.A., f/k/a Wachovia Mortgage, 4 FSB, f/k/a World Savings Bank, FSB (“Wells Fargo”) (erroneously sued as “World 5 Savings Bank, FSB dba Federal Savings Bank”; “Wells Fargo Bank, National 6 Association”) and GOLDEN WEST SAVINGS ASSOCIATION SERVICE CO. 7 (Golden West”), dismissing the Complaint in its entirety. 8 Accordingly: 9 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: 10 1. The Complaint is dismissed, as to all causes of action, with prejudice; 11 2. Judgment is entered in favor of defendants WELLS FARGO BANK, 12 N.A. and GOLDEN WEST SAVINGS ASSOCIATION SERVICE CO.; and 13 3. Plaintiffs, Pablo Duran and Maria Duran will recover nothing in this 14 action from defendants WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. and GOLDEN WEST 15 SAVINGS ASSOCIATION SERVICE CO. 16 May 4, 2016. 17 18 DATED: HON. S. JAMES OTERO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 93000/FR1871/01404124-1 2 CASE NO.: 2:16-CV-01938-SJO-GJS [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 I, the undersigned, declare that I am over the age of 18 and am not a party to this action. I am employed in the City of Pasadena, California; my business 3 address is Anglin, Flewelling, Rasmussen, Campbell & Trytten LLP, 199 S. Los 4 Robles Avenue, Suite 600, Pasadena, California 91101-2459. On the date below, I served a copy of the foregoing document entitled: 5 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL 6 on the interested parties in said case as follows: 7 Served Electronically 8 Via the Court’s CM/ECF System: 9 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 10 Pablo Duran and Maria Duran 11 Jack Ter-Saakyan, Eq. Nicholas H. Van Parys, Esq. 12 JT LEGAL GROUP, APC 801 N. Brand Blvd., Suite 1130 13 Glendale, California 91203 14 Tel.: 818.276.2464 E-Fax: 818.446.2162 15 16 I declare under penalty of perjury under 17 America that the foregoing is true and correct. the laws of theI United States of I declare that am employed in the office of a member of the Bar of this Court, at whose direction the service 18 was made. This declaration is executed in Pasadena, California on May 2, 2016 19 20 21 /s/ Kimberly Wooten (Signature of Declarant) Kimberly Wooten (Type or Print Name) 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 93000/FR1871/01404124-1 1 CASE NO. 2:16-CV-01938-SJO-GJS CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?