Carmelo Raul Haynes v. G. Biaggini et al

Filing 37

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 35 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of t he United States Magistrate Judge. No Objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed within the time allowed for Objections. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 24 is granted; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action without prejudice. (kl)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 CARMELO RAUL HAYNES, 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. G. BIAGGINI, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV 16-1949-ODW (JEM) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No Objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed within the time allowed for Objections. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is granted; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action without prejudice. 25 26 27 28 DATED: October 30, 2017 OTIS D. WRIGHT, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?