Cindee Corliss et al v. County of Los Angeles et al

Filing 30

PROTECTIVE ORDER RE CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth re Stipulation for Protective Order, 29 . (See Order for details) [NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT] (bem)

Download PDF
1 2 3 NOTE: CHANGES M ADE BY THE COURT 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CINDEE CORLISS, an individual; Case No. 2:16-cv-2039 DSF (JPRx) [Hon. Dale S. Fischer; Magistrate Jean P. Rosenbluth] THE ESTATE OF SARA MARIE 12 CORLISS, By and Through the Representative of the Estate, CINDEE 13 CORLISS, 14 v. PROTECTIVE ORDER RE CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS Plaintiff, 15 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a 16 public entity; JIM MCDONNELL, 17 18 19 20 Action Filed: individually and in his Official Capacity as Chief Sheriff of the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department; TERRI MCDONALD, individually and in her Official Capacity as Assistant Sheriff, Custody Operations of the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department; CRDF DEPUTY DOE, an individual; and DOES 2-100, inclusive, December 10, 2015 21 Defendant. 22 23 Plaintiffs CINDEE CORLISS and THE ESTATE OF SARA MARIE 24 CORLISS ("Plaintiffs"), by and through their attorneys, and defendants, COUNTY 25 OF LOS ANGELES, JIM MCDONNELL, and TERRI MCDONALD 26 ("Defendants"), by and through their attorneys, submitted a Joint Stipulation for 27 Entry of Protective Order Re Confidential Documents before this Court. 28 The terms of the Protective Order are as follows: [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PROTECTIVE ORDER RE CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS 1 1 1. The parties hereby respectfully request that any documents produced by 2 the defendants to plaintiffs pertaining to the investigation into the death of Sara 3 Marie Corliss at Century Regional Detention Facility ("CRDF") on January 2, 2015 4 (hereinafter, the "incident"), be subject to the terms of Paragraphs 4 through 15 of 5 this Stipulation and Protective Order. 6 7 GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT 2. The facts and circumstances which gave rise to this civil action took 8 place during an incident involving the decedent Sara Corliss occurring at the 9 Century Regional Detention Center on or about January 2, 2015. Plaintiffs filed the 10 First Amended Complaint on July 12, 2016. Plaintiffs have alleged that the 11 defendants failed to provide immediate medical care for the decedent Sara Corliss in 12 violation of California Government Code §845.6. Further Plaintiffs have also 13 alleged theories of liability under 42 U.S.C. §1983 for loss of familial association, 14 negligence (California Government Code §§ 815.2(a), 820(a), 844.6(d), failure to 15 properly screen and hire and failure to properly train, supervise and discipline. 16 3. The parties wish to have a protective order in place to control 17 dissemination of the documents and other materials produced during the discovery 18 period. The parties also wish to avoid a motion to compel production of documents 19 pertaining to any investigation into the January 2, 2015, incident, and are proceeding 20 with this Stipulation for Protective Order in the interest of case momentum and of 21 conserving judicial resources. TERMS OF THE PROTECTIVE ORDER 22 23 4. The documents set forth in Paragraph 1 are deemed confidential by the 24 parties, except to the extent set forth in the Stipulation and Order, and shall be used 25 solely in connection with this litigation and the preparation and trial of this case, or 26 any related appellate proceedings, and not for any other purpose, including any other 27 litigation, and may not be disclosed or disseminated to other persons, including any 28 other counsel other than as set forth herein. [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PROTECTIVE ORDER RE CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS 2 1 5. Plaintiffs' counsel alone will have custody, control and access to the 2 documents, reports and writings, and will be prohibited from releasing or 3 disseminating the reports or files, or the information contained within the reports or 4 files to other persons including legal counsel other than set forth in Paragraph 9 5 herein. 6 6. Plaintiffs' counsel may make copies of the reports and files, but 7 plaintiffs' counsel will be prohibited from releasing or disseminating such copies or 8 the information contained within such copies other than as set forth herein. 9 7. The documents identified in Paragraph 1 may be submitted in all law 10 and motion proceedings if done so pursuant to Local Rule 79-5. 11 8. All disputes regarding this Protective Order shall be handled pursuant 12 to Local Rule 37. 13 9. The documents may be disclosed to the following persons: 14 (a) counsel for any party to this action; 15 (b) paralegal, stenographic, clerical and secretarial personnel 16 regularly employed by counsel referred to in paragraph (a); 17 (c) court personnel including stenographic reporters engaged in such 18 proceedings as are necessary incident to preparation for the trial in this action; 19 (d) any outside expert or consultant retained in connection with this 20 action, and not otherwise employed by either parties; and 21 (e) any “in-house” or outside experts designated by the defendants 22 to testify at trial in this matter. 23 10. Any documents so disclosed will explicitly require inclusion of a copy 24 of this Stipulation and Protective Order and written instructions from counsel 25 directing compliance with same. 26 11. If, in connection with any deposition taken in this action, plaintiffs' 27 attorneys question a witness regarding materials subject to this Stipulation and 28 Protective Order, or uses confidential material as deposition exhibits, at the request [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PROTECTIVE ORDER RE CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS 3 1 of defense counsel, the relevant portions of the transcripts of such deposition 2 testimony and the exhibits attached to the deposition transcript shall be designated 3 as confidential material and shall be subject to the provisions of this Stipulation and 4 Protective Order. 5 12. The purpose of this Stipulation and Order is not intended to prevent 6 employees of the County of Los Angeles from having access to the documents if 7 they would have had access in the normal course of their job duties. 8 13. Defendants' decision to enter into this Stipulation and Protective Order 9 is made without waiver of the privileges and rights afforded to them, including, but 10 not limited to, the right to privacy embodied by the United States Constitution or the 11 right to object at the time of trial to the admissibility of such or to preclude 12 defendants from filing pre-trial motions with regard to the admissibility thereof or 13 the information contained therein. 14 14. Plaintiffs' counsel agrees to maintain the documents in agreement with 15 the terms of this Stipulation and Order. 16 /// 17 /// 18 /// 19 /// 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PROTECTIVE ORDER RE CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS 4 1 /// 2 15. The provisions of this Order shall be in effect until further Order of the 3 Court or Stipulation by counsel for the parties. 4 The Court has read and considered all of the papers filed in support of this 5 stipulation. Good cause appearing, this Court makes the following orders. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 DATED: February 14, 2017 __________________________________ 28 Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PROTECTIVE ORDER RE CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PROTECTIVE ORDER RE CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS 6 1 Respectfully Submitted by: 2 Minas Samuelian, Esq. (State Bar No. 242804) Robert E. Murphy, Esq. (State Bar No. 103936) 3 Andrew M. Mallett, Esq. (State Bar No. 283345) MANNING & KASS 4 ELLROD, RAMIREZ, TRESTER LLP th 801 S. Figueroa St, 15 Floor 5 Los Angeles, California 90017-3012 Telephone: (213) 624-6900 6 Facsimile: (213) 624-6999 mxs@manningllp.com; rem@manningllp.com 7 azm@manningllp.com 8 Attorneys for Defendant 9 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, JIM MCDONNELL, and TERRI MCDONALD 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PROTECTIVE ORDER RE CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS 7

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?