Andre Borrows v. Spreadshirt, Inc. et al

Filing 50

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE, no later than April 5, 2017, why the Court should not dismiss those three Defendants for failure to effect service of process within the Rule 4(m) period. The Court will discharge this Order upon the filing of a proof of service as to each Defendant. Failure to timely respond to this Order may result in the dismissal of this case without prejudice without further warning from the Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. (jy)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

United States District Court
Central District of California

9
10
11
12

ANDRE BORROWS,
Plaintiff,

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

Case No. 2:16-CV-02064-ODW(RAO)
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

v.
SPREADSHIRT, INC.; RODERICK
RODRIGUEZ; AIDAN WARD;
GRIGORI BOUDENKOV; BARRY
HIGGINS; ANDREW HIGGINS; and
DOES 8 through 10,
Defendants.

21
22

On March 25, 2016, Plaintiff Andre Borrows filed this lawsuit for copyright

23

infringement. (ECF No. 1.) However, it appears Plaintiff failed to serve Defendants

24

Grigori Boudenkov, Barry Higgins, and Andrew Higgins within the Federal Rule of

25

Civil Procedure 4(m) period.

26

Therefore, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE, no later than

27

April 5, 2017, why the Court should not dismiss those three Defendants for failure to

28

effect service of process within the Rule 4(m) period. The Court will discharge this

1

Order upon the filing of a proof of service as to each Defendant. Failure to timely

2

respond to this Order may result in the dismissal of this case without prejudice

3

without further warning from the Court.

4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6

March 28, 2017

7
8
9

____________________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2