Nigel Eric Williams v. Bruce Edwin Aho
Filing
47
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. In light of plaintiff's showing, defendant Bruce Edwin Aho is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing, on or before February 27, 2017, why his answer should not be stricken for failure to comply with his discovery obligations. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 2/27/2017. (jm)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES -GENERAL
Case No.
CV 16-2088 PSG(FFM)
Title
NIGEL ERIC WILLIAMS v. BRUCE EDWIN AHO
Date
February 16, 2017
Present: The Honorable Fred~~~{Mumm,United States Magistrate Judge
James Munoz
None
None
Deputy Clerk
Court Reporter /Recorder
Tape No.
Attorneys Present for Plaintiff:
Attorneys Present for Defendants:
None Present
None Present
Proceedings:
(IN CHAMBERS)ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
The Court is in receipt of plaintiff's motion to compel initial disclosures, filed
February 15, 2017. (Docket Nos. 43 and 44.) Plaintiff asserts that defendant has failed to
produce his initial disclosures despite numerous emails and telephone calls requesting
defendant to comply with his discovery obligations.Plaintifffurther asserts that not only did
defendant not respond to plaintiff's request that he meet to confer about his discovery
failure, but that defendant hung up on plaintiffthe one time he answered the telephone when
plaintiff called.
In light ofplaintiff's showing,defendant Bruce Edwin Aho is ORDERED TO SHOW
CAUSE,in writing, on or before February 27,2017, why his answer should not be stricken
f failure to comply with his discovery obligations.
or
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Initials of Preparer
CV-90(06/04)
CIVIL MINUTES -GENERAL
JM
Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?