Nigel Eric Williams v. Bruce Edwin Aho

Filing 47

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. In light of plaintiff's showing, defendant Bruce Edwin Aho is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing, on or before February 27, 2017, why his answer should not be stricken for failure to comply with his discovery obligations. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 2/27/2017. (jm)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES -GENERAL Case No. CV 16-2088 PSG(FFM) Title NIGEL ERIC WILLIAMS v. BRUCE EDWIN AHO Date February 16, 2017 Present: The Honorable Fred~~~{Mumm,United States Magistrate Judge James Munoz None None Deputy Clerk Court Reporter /Recorder Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None Present None Present Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS)ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE The Court is in receipt of plaintiff's motion to compel initial disclosures, filed February 15, 2017. (Docket Nos. 43 and 44.) Plaintiff asserts that defendant has failed to produce his initial disclosures despite numerous emails and telephone calls requesting defendant to comply with his discovery obligations.Plaintifffurther asserts that not only did defendant not respond to plaintiff's request that he meet to confer about his discovery failure, but that defendant hung up on plaintiffthe one time he answered the telephone when plaintiff called. In light ofplaintiff's showing,defendant Bruce Edwin Aho is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE,in writing, on or before February 27,2017, why his answer should not be stricken f failure to comply with his discovery obligations. or IT IS SO ORDERED. Initials of Preparer CV-90(06/04) CIVIL MINUTES -GENERAL JM Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?