Randee D. Williams, Jr. v. C.E. DuCart

Filing 48

ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition 1 , the other records on file herein, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Reco mmendation 44 , and petitioner's Objections to the Report and Recommendation 47 . The Court accepts the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Report and Recommendation is accepted, with the exception of the respondent's proper name, which is reflected above. 2. Judgment shall be entered consistent with this Order. (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER INFORMATION) (gr)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 WESTERN DIVISION 10 11 RANDEE D. WILLIAMS, JR., 12 Petitioner, 13 14 v. C.E. DuCART, Warden, 15 Respondent. 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV 16-2190-JAK (PLA) ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other records on file 18 herein, the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, and petitioner’s Objections to the 19 Report and Recommendation. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of 20 the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the 21 recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. 22 ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED: 23 1. 24 The Report and Recommendation is accepted, with the exception of the respondent’s proper name, which is reflected above. 25 2. 26 / 27 / 28 / Judgment shall be entered consistent with this Order. 1 3. The clerk shall serve this Order and the Judgment on all counsel or parties of record. 2 3 DATED: June 1, 2017 ___________________________________ HONORABLE JOHN A. KRONSTADT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?