Jose Enrique Banegas v. Steve Langford
Filing
18
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that respondents Motion to Dismiss is granted, and Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice. (ad)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOSE ENRIQUE BANEGAS,
12
Petitioner,
13
v.
14
STEVE LANGFORD, Warden,
15
16
Respondent.
___________________________
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. CV 16-2195-DMG (SP)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
17
18
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on
19 file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.
20 Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to
21 which petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation
22 of the Magistrate Judge.
23
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that respondent’s Motion to Dismiss is
24 granted, and Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action
25 with prejudice.
26
27 DATED: June 8, 2017
28
______________________________
DOLLY M. GEE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?