Jose Enrique Banegas v. Steve Langford

Filing 18

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that respondents Motion to Dismiss is granted, and Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice. (ad)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSE ENRIQUE BANEGAS, 12 Petitioner, 13 v. 14 STEVE LANGFORD, Warden, 15 16 Respondent. ___________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV 16-2195-DMG (SP) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on 19 file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. 20 Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to 21 which petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation 22 of the Magistrate Judge. 23 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that respondent’s Motion to Dismiss is 24 granted, and Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action 25 with prejudice. 26 27 DATED: June 8, 2017 28 ______________________________ DOLLY M. GEE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?