Blvd Supply LLC v. Aphection Inc et al

Filing 7

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. Plaintiff has taken no further action to prosecute this case. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE, in writing, no later than October 26, 2016, why the Court should not dismiss this action without prejudice for lack of prosecution. No hearing will be held. Failure to file a timely written response to this Order will result in the dismissal of the action without prejudice without further warning from the Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. (lom)

1

O

2
3
4
5
6
7
8

United States District Court
Central District of California

9
10
11
12
13

BLVD SUPPLY, LLC, a California
limited liability company,
Plaintiff,

14
15
16
17
18
19

Case No. 2:16-CV-02250-ODW(AFM)

v.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE

APHECTION, INC., a California

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF

corporation; CHUON GUEN LEE, an

PROSECUTION

individual; and Does 1-10, inclusive,
Defendants.

20
21

On April 1, 2016, Plaintiff BLVD Supply LLC, filed a complaint alleging that

22

Defendants, Aphection Inc. and Chuon Guen Lee infringed its registered trademarks

23

by selling “inferior” apparel bearing the marks without consent. (Compl. ¶¶ 5 and 19,

24

ECF No. 1.) However, Defendants never filed an answer. Plaintiff has taken no

25

further action to prosecute this case.

26

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE, in writing, no

27

later than October 26, 2016, why the Court should not dismiss this action without

28

prejudice for lack of prosecution. No hearing will be held. Failure to file a timely

1

written response to this Order will result in the dismissal of the action without

2

prejudice without further warning from the Court.

3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5

October 12, 2016

6
7
8

____________________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2