Jack Wilson et al v. Fidelity Management Trust Company et al

Filing 74

JUDGMENT by Judge Percy Anderson, Related to: Order on Motion for Order, 73 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants shall have judgment in their favor against Plaintiffs. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs' claims are dismissed with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs take nothing and that Defendants shall have their costs of suit. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mrgo)

1

JS-6

2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

In re Disney ERISA Litigation

12

CV 16-2251 PA (JCx)
JUDGMENT

13
14
15
16
17
18

Pursuant to the Court’s November 14, 2016 and April 21, 2017 Minute Orders

19

granting the Motions to Dismiss filed by defendants Investment and Administrative

20

Committee of the Walt Disney Company Sponsored Qualified Benefit Plans and Key

21

Employees Deferred Compensation and Retirement Plan, and committee members Christine

22

McCarthy, Mary Jayne Parker, Jeffrey Shapiro, James Rasulo, Alan Braverman, Brent

23

Woodford, and Jonathan Headley (collectively, “Defendants”), which dismissed all of the

24

claims asserted by plaintiffs Jack Wilson, William Gaudette, and Patricia Du Vall

25

(collectively “Plaintiffs”) against Defendants,

26
27
28

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants shall
have judgment in their favor against Plaintiffs.

1
2
3
4
5

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs’ claims
are dismissed with prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs take
nothing and that Defendants shall have their costs of suit.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

6
7

DATED: April 21, 2017

_________________________________
Percy Anderson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-