Unicolors, Inc. v. H & M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P. et al

Filing 289

AMENDED JUDGMENT by Judge Andre Birotte Jr is entered against H&M and in favor of Unicolors in the amount of $780,774.80 which reflects (a) damages of $266,209.33 for solely domestic United States product sales, (b) attorneys' fees of $508,709.20, and (c) costs of $4,856.27); and Post-judgment interest is awarded against H&M as prescribed by law. (Case CLOSED.) (jp)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 UNICOLORS, INC., 12 Plaintiff, Case No.: CV-16-02322 AB (SKx) Honorable Andre Birotté Jr. [PROPOSED] AMENDED 13 vs. JUDGMENT 14 H&M HENNES & MAURITZ, LP; et al., 15 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 [PROPOSED] AMENDED JUDGMENT -1- 1 2 [PROPOSED] AMENDED JUDGMENT THE COURT ORDERS AND ENTERS JUDGMENT FOR 3 UNICOLORS, INC. (“UNICOLORS”) AGAINST H&M HENNES & 4 MAURITZ, LP (“H&M”) AS FOLLOWS: 5 1. Unicolors owns a valid copyright and registration for design EH101; 6 2. H&M is liable for the willful copyright infringement of Unicolors’ 7 8 design EH101; 3. 9 Judgment is entered against H&M and in favor of Unicolors in the amount of seven hundred eighty-thousand seven hundred seventy- 10 four dollars and eighty cents ($780,774.80), which reflects (a) 11 damages of two hundred sixty-six thousand two hundred nine dollars 12 and thirty-three cents ($266,209.33) for solely domestic United States 13 product sales, (b) attorneys’ fees of five hundred eight thousand seven 14 hundred nine dollars and twenty cents ($508,709.20), and (c) costs of 15 five thousand eight hundred fifty-six dollars and twenty-seven cents 16 ($5,856.27); and 17 18 4. Post-judgment interest is awarded against H&M as prescribed by law. 19 20 Dated: October 22, 2018 21 By: ____________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE HONORABLE ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR. 22 23 24 25 26 27 [PROPOSED] AMENDED JUDGMENT -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?