Unicolors, Inc. v. H & M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P. et al
Filing
289
AMENDED JUDGMENT by Judge Andre Birotte Jr is entered against H&M and in favor of Unicolors in the amount of $780,774.80 which reflects (a) damages of $266,209.33 for solely domestic United States product sales, (b) attorneys' fees of $508,709.20, and (c) costs of $4,856.27); and Post-judgment interest is awarded against H&M as prescribed by law. (Case CLOSED.) (jp)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
UNICOLORS, INC.,
12 Plaintiff,
Case No.: CV-16-02322 AB (SKx)
Honorable Andre Birotté Jr.
[PROPOSED] AMENDED
13 vs.
JUDGMENT
14
H&M HENNES & MAURITZ, LP; et al.,
15
16 Defendants.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
[PROPOSED] AMENDED JUDGMENT
-1-
1
2
[PROPOSED] AMENDED JUDGMENT
THE COURT ORDERS AND ENTERS JUDGMENT FOR
3 UNICOLORS, INC. (“UNICOLORS”) AGAINST H&M HENNES &
4 MAURITZ, LP (“H&M”) AS FOLLOWS:
5
1.
Unicolors owns a valid copyright and registration for design EH101;
6
2.
H&M is liable for the willful copyright infringement of Unicolors’
7
8
design EH101;
3.
9
Judgment is entered against H&M and in favor of Unicolors in the
amount of seven hundred eighty-thousand seven hundred seventy-
10
four dollars and eighty cents ($780,774.80), which reflects (a)
11
damages of two hundred sixty-six thousand two hundred nine dollars
12
and thirty-three cents ($266,209.33) for solely domestic United States
13
product sales, (b) attorneys’ fees of five hundred eight thousand seven
14
hundred nine dollars and twenty cents ($508,709.20), and (c) costs of
15
five thousand eight hundred fifty-six dollars and twenty-seven cents
16
($5,856.27); and
17
18
4.
Post-judgment interest is awarded against H&M as prescribed by
law.
19
20 Dated: October 22, 2018
21
By: ____________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
HONORABLE ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR.
22
23
24
25
26
27
[PROPOSED] AMENDED JUDGMENT
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?