Norman Okazaki v. Amigo Ability International Inc et al
Filing
44
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT'S ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 9/23/2016. (jloz)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES -- GENERAL
Case No.
CV 16-2460-JFW (AFMx)
Title:
Norman Okazaki-v- Amigo Ability International, Inc., et al.
Date: September 19, 2016
PRESENT:
HONORABLE JOHN F. WALTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Shannon Reilly
Courtroom Deputy
None Present
Court Reporter
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFFS:
None
PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS):
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS:
None
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD
NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH
THE COURT’S ORDER
In the Court’s Scheduling and Case Management Order (“CMO”) filed on April 26, 2016
[Docket No. 14], the Court set September 19, 2016 as the last day to conduct a Settlement
Conference, and September 26, 2016 as the last day to file a Joint Report Re: Results of
Settlement Conference. Based on the Stipulation for Continuance of Trial and Pre-Trial Dates Set
Forth in Scheduling Order filed on September 16, 2016 [Docket No. 41], the parties have violated
the Court’s CMO by failing to conduct the Settlement Conference by the Court-ordered deadline of
September 19, 2016.
Accordingly, the parties are ordered to show cause in writing by September 23, 2016 why
the Court should not impose sanctions in the amount of $1,500.00 against lead counsel for each of
the parties for their violation of the Court’s CMO. No oral argument on this matter will be heard
unless otherwise ordered by the Court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; Local Rule 7-15. The Order to
Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause.
Failure to respond to the Order to Show Cause will result in the imposition of sanctions.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Initials of Deputy Clerk sr
Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?