Daniel Hipolito v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Filing 23

JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Victor E Bianchini, in favor of Daniel Hipolito against Carolyn W. Colvin. For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Decision and Order 22 , it is hereby DECREED THAT (1) Plaintiff's request for an order remand ing this case for further proceedings is GRANTED and the Commissioner's decision is REVERSED; (2) the Commissioner's request for an order affirming the Commissioner's final decision and dismissing the action is DENIED; (3) judgment is entered in Plaintiff's favor and this case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the Decision and Order; and (4) this case is CLOSED without prejudice to a timely application for attorneys' fees and costs. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (wr)

Download PDF
JS-6 1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 Case No. 2:16-CV-02472 (VEB) 7 DANIEL HIPOLITO, 8 Plaintiff, JUDGMENT 9 vs. 10 11 12 NANCY BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Decision and Order, it is hereby DECREED THAT (1) Plaintiff’s request for an order remanding this case for further proceedings is GRANTED and the Commissioner’s decision is REVERSED; (2) the Commissioner’s request for an order affirming the Commissioner’s final decision and dismissing the action is DENIED; (3) judgment is entered in Plaintiff’s favor and this case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the Decision 1 JUDGMENT – HIPOLITO v BERRYHILL 2:16-CV-02472-VEB 1 and Order; and (4) this case is CLOSED without prejudice to a timely application for 2 attorneys’ fees and costs. 3 4 5 DATED this 11th day of September, 2017, /s/Victor E. Bianchini VICTOR E. BIANCHINI UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2 JUDGMENT – HIPOLITO v BERRYHILL 2:16-CV-02472-VEB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?