Alejandro Espinoza Martinez v. W. L. Montgomery

Filing 32

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Josephine L. Staton for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 14 IT IS ORDERED that the Petition is denied, and Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. (sbu)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ALEJANDRO ESPINOZA
MARTINEZ,

12
13
14
15

Petitioner,
v.
W.L. MONTGOMERY, Warden,
Respondent.

Case No. CV 16-02553 JLS (RAO)

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,
CONCLUSIONS, AND
RECOMMENDATIONS OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
JUDGE

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the
records and files herein, and the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation.
Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report
and Recommendation to which Petitioner objected. Accordingly, the Court accepts
and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.
IT IS ORDERED that the Petition is denied, and Judgment shall be entered
dismissing this action with prejudice.
DATED: May 2, 2017
JOSEPHINE L. STATON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE