Igor Shabanets et al v. Karenta, LLC., et al
Filing
21
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: FAILURE TO OPPOSE by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. Plaintiffs are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to why the Court should not grant Defendants' Motion. Both (1) Plaintiffs response to this Order and (2) Plaintiffs' o pposition to Defendants Motion, if any, shall be filed by no later than Friday, July 1, 2016, at 12:00 p.m. An appropriate response will include reasons demonstrating good cause for Plaintiffs' failure to timely oppose. If Plaintiffs fail to respond, the Court may grant Defendants' Motion pursuant to Local Rule 7-12. (rfi)
LINK:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No.
CV 16-02718-BRO (MRWx)
Title
IGOR SHABANETS, ET AL. V. KARENTA, LLC., ET AL.
Date
June 27, 2016
Present: The Honorable
BEVERLY REID O’CONNELL, United States District Judge
Renee A. Fisher
Not Present
N/A
Deputy Clerk
Court Reporter
Tape No.
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:
Proceedings:
Attorneys Present for Defendants:
Not Present
(IN CHAMBERS)
Not Present
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: FAILURE TO OPPOSE
Pending before the Court is Defendants Sergey Bazylev, OOO Karenta,1 Albert
Popov, and Dmitry Rasskazov’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss or Quash
Service of Summons for Inadequate Service of Process pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 12(b)(5).2 (Dkt. No. 18.) The hearing of this motion is scheduled for July 11,
2016. (See id.) Central District Local Rule 7-9 requires oppositions to be filed no later
than twenty-one (21) days prior to the scheduled hearing date. See C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-9.
Thus, Plaintiffs Igor Shabanets and East West Meat Trading, LLC’s (collectively,
“Plaintiffs”) opposition, if any, was due no later than June 20, 2016. To date, however,
Plaintiffs have failed to oppose Defendants’ Motion. Pursuant to Local Rule 7-12, the
failure to file an opposition “may be deemed consent to the granting . . . of the motion.”
See C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-12.
Accordingly, Plaintiffs are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to why the Court
should not grant Defendants’ Motion. Both (1) Plaintiffs’ response to this Order and
(2) Plaintiffs’ opposition to Defendants’ Motion, if any, shall be filed by no later
than Friday, July 1, 2016, at 12:00 p.m. An appropriate response will include reasons
demonstrating good cause for Plaintiffs’ failure to timely oppose. If Plaintiffs fail to
respond, the Court may grant Defendants’ Motion pursuant to Local Rule 7-12.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Initials of Preparer
rf
1
Plaintiffs erroneously sued Defendant OOO Karenta as Karenta, LLC. (See Dkt. No. 18-1 at 1 n.1.)
2
Defendants are specially appearing in this matter.
CV-90 (06/04)
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?