Quinn Alexander Marez v. Guillermo Viera Rosa
Filing
27
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 23 by Judge Dolly M. Gee. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: (1) Respondents motion to dismiss is denied; (2) Petitioners motion for appointment of counsel is denied; and (3) Respondent is ordered to file an Answer to the Petition within forty-five (45) days. (es) Modified on 9/25/2017 (es).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
WESTERN DIVISION
11
QUINN ALEXANDER MAREZ,
12
Petitioner,
13
v.
14
GUILLERMO VIERA ROSA,
15
Respondent.
16
17
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. CV 16-02762-DMG (DFM)
Order Accepting Findings and
Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge
18
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the petition,
19
20
Respondent’s motion to dismiss, the other records on file herein, and the
21
Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Neither
22
party has filed any written objections to the Report. The Court accepts the
23
findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: (1) Respondent’s motion to
2
dismiss is denied; (2) Petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied;
3
and (3) Respondent is ordered to file an Answer to the Petition within forty-
4
five (45) days.
5
6
DATED: September 25, 2017
______________________________
DOLLY M. GEE
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?