Quinn Alexander Marez v. Guillermo Viera Rosa

Filing 27

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 23 by Judge Dolly M. Gee. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: (1) Respondents motion to dismiss is denied; (2) Petitioners motion for appointment of counsel is denied; and (3) Respondent is ordered to file an Answer to the Petition within forty-five (45) days. (es) Modified on 9/25/2017 (es).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WESTERN DIVISION 11 QUINN ALEXANDER MAREZ, 12 Petitioner, 13 v. 14 GUILLERMO VIERA ROSA, 15 Respondent. 16 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV 16-02762-DMG (DFM) Order Accepting Findings and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the petition, 19 20 Respondent’s motion to dismiss, the other records on file herein, and the 21 Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Neither 22 party has filed any written objections to the Report. The Court accepts the 23 findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: (1) Respondent’s motion to 2 dismiss is denied; (2) Petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied; 3 and (3) Respondent is ordered to file an Answer to the Petition within forty- 4 five (45) days. 5 6 DATED: September 25, 2017 ______________________________ DOLLY M. GEE United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?