Eleobardo Lopez v. S. Frauenheim
Filing
18
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge James V. Selna for Report and Recommendation (Issued). IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Respondent's motion to dismiss is granted in part, the Petition is denied, and Judgment be entered dismissing this action without prejudice. The Court takes no position on whether any new petition Petitioner may file would be timely or second or successive. (See Order for details) 17 , 10 (bem)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
ELEOBARDO LOPEZ,
14
) Case No. CV 16-2782-JVS (JPR)
)
)
) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND
) RECOMMENDATIONS OF U.S.
) MAGISTRATE JUDGE
)
)
)
)
15
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the
10
Petitioner,
11
v.
12
S. FRAUENHEIM, Warden,
13
Respondent.
16 Petition, records on file, and Report and Recommendation of U.S.
17 Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Report and Recommendation
18 have been filed, and, although the Magistrate Judge gave him the
19 opportunity to do so, Petitioner has not requested a stay. The
20 Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate
21 Judge.
22
IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Respondent’s motion to dismiss
23 is granted in part, the Petition is denied, and Judgment be
24 entered dismissing this action without prejudice. The Court
25 takes no position on whether any new petition Petitioner may file
26 would be timely or second or successive.
27
28 DATED: January 24, 2017
JAMES V. SELNA
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?