Eric Ellis v. Carolyn W Colvin

Filing 23

ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. Fees awarded to plaintiff in the amount of $ $3,500.00 Re: Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees 22 (sbu)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Brian C. Shapiro Attorney at Law: 192789 Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing 12631 East Imperial Highway, Suite C-115 Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 Tel.: (562)868-5886 Fax: (562)868-8868 E-mail: rohlfing.office@rohlfinglaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Eric Carlton Ellis 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 ERIC CARLTON ELLIS, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 14 vs. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,1 Defendant 15 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 2:16-cv-02803-PLA ORDER AWARDING EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) 17 Based upon the parties’ Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal 18 19 Access to Justice Act Fees, Costs, and Expenses: 20 21 22 23 24 25 1 Nancy A. Berryhill is now the Acting Commissioner of Social Security. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Nancy A. Berryhill should be substituted for Acting Commissioner Carolyn W. Colvin as the defendant in this suit. No further action needs to be taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). 26 -1- 1 2 IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of $3,500 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412 be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation. 3 4 DATE: March 3, 2017 THE HONORABLE PAUL L. ABRAMS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Respectfully submitted, 20 LAW OFFICES OF Lawrence D. Rohlfing 21 /s/ Brian C. Shapiro _________________________ Brian C. Shapiro Attorney for plaintiff Eric Carlton Ellis 22 23 24 25 26 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?