CitiMortgage, Inc v. Candida Mobley Wright et al

Filing 215

JUDGMENT ON MORTGAGE, INC.'S FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT AS TO THE FOLLOWING CAUSES OF ACTION: (1) QUIET TITLE (ad of 4/25/2007); (2) CANCELLATION; AND (3) DECLARATORY RELIEF by Judge Dale S. Fischer. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated).(SEE JUDGMENT FOR SPECIFICS) (bp)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 JS 6 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 WESTERN DIVISION 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No.: 2:16-cv-2920-DSF-FFMx CITIMORTGAGE, INC., a New York corporation, Plaintiff, v. JUDGMENT ON CITIMORTGAGE, INC.’S FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT AS TO THE FOLLOWING CAUSES OF ACTION: CANDIDA MOBLEY WRIGHT (A/K/A DARCI CANDIDA MOBLEY A/K/A CANDIDA WRIGHT A/K/A CANDIDA MOBLEY), as an individual and as trustee for the Wright Revocable Family Trust and as co-trustee for the Candida Mobley Revocable Trust; BENNY HARRIS, an individual; ANGELLINE FAAPUTU AFO, an individual; TONY RUMFORD, an individual; JIMMY LEE NICHOLAS, as co-trustee for the Candida Mobley Revocable Trust; MARIA NAVARRO, as co-trustee for the Candida Mobley Revocable Trust; JULES HOWARD, JR., an individual; TONIA FRANKLIN (A/K/A TANIA FRANKLIN), an individual; DURELL (1) QUIET TITLE (as of 4/25/2007); (2) CANCELLATION; AND (3) DECLARATORY RELIEF 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 COLEMAN, an individual, BARBARA DONAHUE, an individual; ALL PERSONS UNKNOWN, CLAIMING ANY LEGAL OR EQUITABLE RIGHT, TITLE, ESTATE, LIEN, OR INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THE COMPLAINT ADVERSE TO PLAINTIFF’S TITLE, OR ANY CLOUD UPON PLAINTIFF’S TITLE THERETO; and DOES 1-50, inclusive, 9 Defendants. 10 After consideration of the papers in support of the Application for Default 11 Judgment, and Judgment Relating to the Fourth Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff 12 CitiMortgage, Inc., and the pleadings and papers on file in this action, including 13 CitiMortgage’s Motion for Summary Adjudication against Candida Mobley Wright 14 (Mobley) and all supporting papers (Dkt. Nos. 154, 169-172, 174), and the Stipulation 15 for Entry of Final Judgment between Mobley and CitiMortgage (Dkt. 206), judgment is 16 entered in favor of CitiMortgage against Defendants Benny Harris, Angelline Faaputu 17 Afo, Tony Rumford, Jimmy Lee Nicholas, Maria Navarro, Jules Howard, Jr., Tonia 18 Franklin (a/k/a Tania Franklin), and Durell Coleman (collectively, Defaulting 19 Defendants). 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The “Property” at issue in this litigation is commonly known as 15523 Collina Strada Street, Los Angeles, California 90077, and is legally described as: Lot 18 of Tract No. 25625, in the City of Los Angeles, County of Los Angeles, State of California, as per map recorded in book 834 pages 93 to 96 of maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said county. Except therefrom all oil, gas, minerals, and other hydrocarbon substances lying below a depth of 500 feet, but with no right of surface entry, as provided in deed recorded June 9, 1976 as Instrument No. 524, Official Records. 2 Based on the evidence presented by CitiMortgage in this action and the 1 2 Stipulation for Judgment between Mobley and CitiMortgage, CitiMortgage has 3 demonstrated that it is entitled to a judgment on its First Cause of Action for Quiet Title 4 against the Defaulting Defendants on the Property. In addition, CitiMortgage is entitled to default judgment on its other causes of 5 6 action as requested in the Application 7 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT: 8 1. CitiMortgage is the prevailing party on its causes of action for Quiet Title, 9 Cancellation, and Declaratory Relief. Based on this ruling, CitiMortgage’s causes of 10 action for Reformation, Equitable Lien, and Equitable Subrogation are rendered moot 11 and dismissed without prejudice. 2. 12 The 2007 Deed of Trust, recorded on April 25, 2007 in the Official 13 Records, Recorder’s Office, Los Angeles County, California, as Instrument 14 20070994221 (2007 Deed of Trust), encumbers 100% of the Property. 3. 15 CitiMortgage was assigned all beneficial interest and all rights accrued or 16 to accrue through an Assignment of Deed of Trust. The Assignment was recorded on 17 May 11, 2011 with the Official Records, Recorder’s Office, Los Angeles County, 18 California, as Instrument No. 20110665182. 4. 19 The Grant Deed conveying the Property from Howard to Mobley, which 20 was recorded in the Official Records, Recorder’s Office, Los Angeles County, 21 California on November 2, 2009, as Instrument No. 20091651658 (Secret Grant Deed), 22 was a sham document, executed during the escrow process by which Mobley was 23 conveying the Property to Howard. It was not supported by consideration. See Dkt. 24 206. 25 5. The grant deeds executed by Mobley between 2011 and 2015, which 26 purported to transfer interests in the Property to one or more of the Defaulting 27 28 Defendants are void, because they were sham contracts, were entered into for the illegal purpose of interfering with CitiMortgage’s right to foreclose, and lacked consideration. 3 1 These include the documents recorded in the Official Records, Recorder’s Office, Los 2 Angeles County, California, identified as: 3  Instrument No. 20110602666, Grant Deed – Trust Transfer, recorded on April 2, 2011;  Instrument No. 20110772419, Trust Transfer Grant Deed, recorded on June 6, 2011;  Instrument No. 20110903861, Trust Transfer Grant Deed, recorded on July 5, 2011;  Instrument No. 20111041592, Trust Transfer Grant Deed, recorded on August 3, 2011;  Instrument No. 20111233385, Trust Transfer Grant Deed, recorded on September 12, 2011;  Instrument No. 20111376340, Trust Transfer Grant Deed, recorded on October 11, 2011;  Instrument No. 20111535170, Trust Transfer Grant Deed, recorded on November 14, 2011;  Instrument No. 20121156040, Grant Deed, recorded on August 3, 2012;  Instrument No. 20130984508, Grant Deed, recorded on July 3, 2013;  Instrument No. 2015553805, Grant Deed, recorded on May 13, 2015;  Instrument No. 20140834289, Grant Deed, recorded on August 11, 2014;  Instrument No. 20150978745, Grant Deed, recorded on August 11, 2015; and  The “Grant Deed” from Darci Candida Mobley conveying an undivided 5% interest to Tonia Franklin, referenced in a petition filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Central Division on February 13, 2015 assigned as Case No. 2:15-bk-12207-VZ (which may not have been recorded). 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 1 2 (Collectively, Fractional Grant Deeds.) 6. First Cause of Action – Quiet Title: Judgment is entered in favor of 3 CitiMortgage on its Quiet Title cause of action. Specifically, CitiMortgage’s lien 4 interest, based on the 2007 Deed of Trust, attached against 100% of the Property as of 5 April 25, 2007, and is superior to any purported to any right, title, estate, lien or interest 6 in the Property of any of the Defaulting Defendants. Further, the Fractional Grant 7 Deeds and Secret Grant Deed are void. 8 9 7. Second Cause of Action – Cancellation: Default Judgment is entered in favor of CitiMortgage on its Cancellation cause of action. Specifically, the Fractional 10 Grant Deeds and Secret Grant Deed were sham documents and are void. They are 11 cancelled. 12 8. Sixth Cause of Action – Declaratory Relief: Default Judgment is entered 13 in favor of CitiMortgage on its Declaratory Relief cause of action. Specifically, the 14 Court determines: 15 a) That CitiMortgage holds the first and senior security lien against 100% of the Property pursuant to the 2007 Deed of Trust. b) That the Fractional Grant Deeds and Secret Grant Deed are cancelled/voided. c) That any interest in the Property that may be asserted by the Defaulting Defendants is junior and subordinate to the interest held by CitiMortgage against the Property. 16 17 18 19 20 21 9. CitiMortgage may cause this Final Judgment to be recorded with the Los 22 Angeles County Recorder’s Office. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 26 DATED: 4/6/18 Dale S. Fischer United States District Judge 27 28 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?