David Truth King v. V.P.D.
Filing
11
MINUTE (In Chambers) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this case shoul d not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with a court order. Plaintiff shall file a written response to this Order to Show Cause no later than August 12, 2016. Plaintiff's failure to respond in writing to the Order to Show Cause by the deadline will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with a court order. Filing of a First Amended Complaint consistent with the requirements of the Court's June 13, 2016 Order shall be a satisfactory response to the Order to Show Cause. No extensions of this deadline will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances. (See Order for Further Details) (kl)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.
Title
Date
CV 16-3031-BRO (JEM)
August 1, 2016
David Truth King v. V.P.D.
Present: The
Honorable
John E. McDermott, United States Magistrate Judge
S. Anthony
n/a
Deputy Clerk
Court Reporter / Recorder
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:
Attorneys Present for Defendants:
None Present
None Present
Proceedings:
(In Chambers) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE
DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH
A COURT ORDER
Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to
42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 13, 2016, the Court issues a Memorandum and Order Dismissing
Complaint with Leave to Amend. Plaintiff had until July 13, 2016 to file a First Amended Complaint
(“FAC”). He was cautioned that failure to do so by the deadline could result in a recommendation that
this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court order.
To date, Plaintiff has not filed a FAC.
Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be dismissed
for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with a court order.
Plaintiff shall file a written response to this Order to Show Cause no later than August 12, 20161.
Plaintiff’s failure to respond in writing to the Order to Show Cause by the deadline will result in a
recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with a court
order.
Filing of a First Amended Complaint consistent with the requirements of the Court’s June 13,
2016 Order shall be a satisfactory response to the Order to Show Cause.
No extensions of this deadline will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.
cc: Parties
:
Initials of Deputy Clerk
sa
1
Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, oral argument on this Order to
Show Cause will not be heard unless ordered by the Court. Upon the filing of a Response, the Order to Show Cause will stand
submitted.
CV-90 (12/02)
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?