Colt International Clothing, Inc v. Quasar Science LLC et al

Filing 200

JUDGMENT UNDER RULE 54(b) AS TO ALL CLAIMS BETWEEN PLAINTIFF COLT INTERNATIONAL AND DEFENDANT CINELEASE by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that final judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Cinelease, Inc. and against Plaintiff Colt Industries, Inc. on all counts of Plaintiff's Complaint and Cinelease's Counterclaim. (gk)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION

11
12 COLT INTERNATIONAL
CLOTHING INC. dba COLT LED, a
13 California corporation,,
Plaintiff,

14
15

v.

16 QUASAR SCIENCE, LLC, a California
limited liability company; and
17 CINELEASE, INC, a Nevada
corporation,
18
Defendant.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

And Related Counter-Claims

Case No. 2:16-cv-03040 AB (JEMx)
JUDGMENT UNDER RULE 54(b)
AS TO ALL CLAIMS BETWEEN
PLAINTIFF COLT
INTERNATIONAL AND
DEFENDANT CINELEASE

1

WHEREAS, on May 3, 2016, Plaintiff Colt Industries, Inc. (“Colt”) filed a

2 Complaint (“Plaintiff’s Complaint”) for patent infringement, induced patent
3 infringement and contributory patent infringement, alleging that Defendants
4 Cinelease, Inc. (“Cinelease”) and Quasar Science, LLC (“Quasar”) infringed United
5 States Patent No. 9,239,134;
6

WHEREAS, on June 8, 2016, Cinelease filed a Counterclaim (“Cinelease’s

7 Counterclaim”) consisting of two counts, requesting a judgment of non-infringement
8 (Count 1) and invalidity (Count 2);
9

WHEREAS, on July 31, 2018, Cinelease filed a Motion for Summary

10 Judgment that all claims of Patent No. 9,239,134 were invalid;
11

WHEREAS, on September 27, 2019, this Court issued an Order granting that

12 Motion for Summary Judgment and holding that all claims of United States Patent
13 No. 9,239,134 were invalid; and
14

WHEREAS, this Court finds under F.R.Civ.P. 54(b) that there is no just

15 reason for delay in entering final judgment in favor of Cinelease and against Colt
16 (on all counts of Plaintiff’s Complaint and on all counts of Cinelease’s
17 Counterclaim), and therefore expressly so directs.
18 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED THAT:
19

Final judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Cinelease, Inc. and against

20 Plaintiff Colt Industries, Inc. on all counts of Plaintiff’s Complaint and Cinelease’s
21 Counterclaim.
22
23 Dated: November 26, 2019
24
25
26
27

The Hon. André Birotte, Jr.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

28
2