Sintel Systems, Inc. v. FroyoWorld Allston et al
Filing
66
DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT FROYO AP, LLC by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: that Plaintiff Sintel Systems, Inc. have judgment against Defendant (SEE ATTACHMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS), further ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defendant shall pay to Plaintiff the amount of $22,473.04, consisting of $19,734 in damages and $2,739.04 in attorneys fees and costs, jointly and severally with co-defendants. (jp)
NO JS-6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
SINTEL SYSTEMS, INC.,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
v.
Case No. 2:16-cv-03091 BRO (JCx)
DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST
DEFENDANT FROYO AP, LLC
Hon. Beverly Reid O’Connell
FROYOWORLD ALLSTON, form
unknown, et al.,
Defendants.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
This action having been commenced on May 4, 2016 with the filing of the
Summons and Complaint, and a copy of the Summons and Complaint having been
validly served on Defendant Froyo AP, LLC (“Defendant”) on October 6, 2016. See
ECF No. 36), and Defendant not having answered the Complaint, and the time for
answering the Complaint having expired;
It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: that Plaintiff Sintel
Systems, Inc. have judgment against Defendant, finding that Defendant has:
1
1
1.
2
3
engaged in actions constituting Breach of Contract under California
common law;
2.
engaged in actions constituting Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
4
under the California Trade Secrets Act (“CUTSA”), Cal. Civ. Code §
5
3426.1;
6
3.
7
8
9
10
11
Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”), Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200;
4.
14
15
16
17
engaged in actions constituting Conversion under California common
law;
5.
engaged in actions constituting Unjust Enrichment under California
common law; and
12
13
engaged in actions constituting Unfair Competition under California’s
6.
engaged in actions constituting Trespass to Chattels under California
common law.
It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defendant shall
pay to Plaintiff the amount of $22,473.04, consisting of $19,734 in damages and
$2,739.04 in attorneys’ fees and costs, jointly and severally with co-defendants.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: March 22, 2017
By:
Honorable Beverly R. O’Connell
United States District Court Judge
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?