Anthony Terrel Williams v. Warren L. Montgomery

Filing 26

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Andre Birotte Jr for Report and Recommendation (Issued), 24 (sbu)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ANTHONY TERRELL WILLIAMS, ) ) Petitioner, ) v. ) ) ) WARREN L. MONTGOMERY, ) Respondent. ) _________________________________ ) NO. CV 16-3126-AB (KS) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas 19 Corpus (“Petition”), the Motion to Dismiss (“Motion”) and related briefing, the Report and 20 Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”), and Petitioner’s Objections to 21 the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (“Objections”). As per 28 U.S.C. § 22 636(b)(1)(C) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those 23 portions of the Report to which objections have been stated. 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 // 1 1 Having completed its review, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations set 2 forth in the Report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Motion is GRANTED; (2) 3 the Petition is DENIED; (3) Petitioner’s Motion to Amend is DENIED; and (4) Judgment 4 shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. 5 6 DATED: March 26, 2017 ________________________________ ANDRÉ BIROTTE, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?