Securities and Exchange Commission v. Imran Husain et al
ORDER RE SCHEDULING by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: After considering Defendants statements in the Joint Report, the Court will not issue a scheduling order at this time. Defendants shall submit any motion to stay to the Court on or before June 15, 2017. Failure to submit the motion by that date will result in issuance of scheduling order without further notice. The May 22, 2017 scheduling conference is vacated and taken off calendar. (lc). Modified on 5/16/2017 (lc).
United States District Court
Central District of California
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
Case No. 2:16-cv-03250-ODW(E)
ORDER RE SCHEDULING
IMRAN HUSAIN and GREGG EVAN
On May 15, 2017, the parties filed a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f)
Report. (ECF No. 55.) In that report, Defendants indicate there is a parallel criminal
investigation being conducted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office in San Francisco of
which they are “possible targets or subjects of investigation.” (Joint Rpt. 6, ECF No.
55.) With this in mind, Defendants believe discovery in this case might implicate
their rights and privileges under the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution and should
thus be delayed. (Id.) Defendants indicate that they intend to file a motion to stay on
these grounds. (Id.)
After considering Defendants’ statements in the Joint Report, the Court will not
issue a scheduling order at this time. Defendants shall submit any motion to stay to
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?