Stella Lopez v. Carolyn W. Colvin
JUDGMENT OF REMAND by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the terms of the Stipulation to Remand. Related to: Order 22 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (vm)
1 EILEEN M. DECKER
United States Attorney
2 DOROTHY A. SCHOUTEN
3 Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Civil Division
4 ROBYN-MARIE LYON MONTELEONE
5 Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, General Civil Section
6 MARLA K. LETELLIER, CSBN 234969
7 Special Assistant United States Attorney
Social Security Administration
160 Spear Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: (415) 977-8928
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
Attorneys for Defendant
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16 STELLA LOPEZ,
JUDGMENT OF REMAND
20 NANCY A. BERRYHILL1, Acting
21 Commissioner of Social Security,
Nancy A. Berryhill is now the Acting Commissioner of Social Security.
26 Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Nancy A. Berryhill
27 should be substituted for Acting Commissioner Carolyn W. Colvin as the defendant in
this suit. No further action needs to be taken to continue this suit by reason of the last
28 sentence of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
The Court having approved the parties’ Stipulation to Voluntary Remand
Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment
(“Stipulation to Remand”) lodged concurrently with the Judgment of Remand, IT
IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above
captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further
proceedings consistent with the terms of the Stipulation to Remand.
HON. MICHAEL R. WILNER
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Stipulation for Remand
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?