Ernesto Yglesias v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Filing 19

ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm in the amount of $2,485.57 and Court costs $400 Re: Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees 18 (jm)

Download PDF
ANDREW T. KOENIG, State Bar No. 158431 Attorney at Law 2 93 S. Chestnut Street, Suite 208 Ventura, California 93001 3 Telephone: (805) 653-7937 Facsimile: (805) 653-7225 4 E-Mail: andrewtkoenig@hotmail.com 1 5 Attorney for Plaintiff Ernesto Yglesias 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION 8 9 10 ERNESTO YGLESIAS, 11 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 NANCY A. BERRYHILL,1 15 ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 16 17 Defendant. ) CASE NO. CV 16-03406-FFM ) ) ) [PROPOSED] ORDER ) AWARDING ATTORNEY’S ) FEES AND COSTS PURSUANT ) TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO ) JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. ) § 2412(d), AND COURT COSTS ) PURSUANT TO ) 28 U.S.C. § 1920 ) ) ) 18 19 Based upon the parties’ Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees (“Stipulation”), 20 IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff is awarded attorney fees under the Equal Access to 21 Justice Act in the amount of TWO-THOUSAND FOUR-HUNDRED EIGHTY- 22 23 1 Nancy A. Berryhill is now the Acting Commissioner of Social 24 Security. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 25 Nancy A. Berryhill should be substituted for Acting Commissioner Carolyn 26 W. Colvin as the defendant in this suit. No further action needs to be taken 27 to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the 28 Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). 1 1 FIVE DOLLARS and 57 CENTS ($2,485.57), as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2 2412(d), and Court costs in the amount of FOUR-HUNDRED DOLLARS and NO 3 CENTS, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1920, subject to the terms of the Stipulation. 4 5 6 7 Dated: February 15, 2017 /S/ FREDERICK F. MUMM FREDERICK F. MUMM UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?