Saghar Javidifar v. Wal Mart Stores Inc et al
Filing
24
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon re Stipulation for Order 22 . (ib)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
SAGHAR JAVIDIFAR,
Plaintiff,
12
13
v.
14
WALMART STORES, INC. and
DOES 1 to 20,
15
Defendants.
16
17
CASE NO.: 2:16-cv-03435-JGB-AFM
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE
ORDER [PROPOSED ORDER]
Courtroom:
1
District Judge: Jesus G. Bernal
Magistrate Judge: Alexander F.
MacKinnon
Complaint Filed: November 18, 2015
Trial Date:
April 25, 2017
18
19
Based on the Parties’ stipulation and good cause appearing, the Court hereby
20
21
ENTERS the Protective Order as to the following terms:
WHEREAS, Plaintiff has propounded or will propound certain discovery
22
23
requests to WAL-MART seeking information which WAL-MART considers
24
proprietary, confidential business records and/or trade secrets;
25
1.
26
Purposes and Limitations
Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential,
27
proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public
28
disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may
2354-8567
1
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 2:16-cv-03435-JGB (AFMx)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
be warranted. Accordingly, the Parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to
enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The Parties acknowledge that the
Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to
discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends
only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment
under the applicable legal principles.
2.
Good Cause
This action is likely to involve WAL-MART’s trade secrets, confidential
business records, and other valuable research, development, commercial, financial,
technical and/or proprietary information (“confidential documents and
information”) for which special protection from public disclosure is warranted.
Such confidential and proprietary materials and information consist of, among other
things, confidential business or financial information, information regarding
confidential business policies, or other confidential development or commercial
information (including information implicating privacy rights of third parties),
information otherwise generally unavailable to the public, or which may be
privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under state or federal statutes,
court rules, case decisions, or common law.
Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, facilitate the prompt
resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, adequately
protect information the Parties are entitled to keep confidential, ensure that the
Parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses of such material in preparation for
and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling at the end of the litigation, and
serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such information is justified in this
matter. The Parties do not intend to designate this information as confidential for
tactical reasons and nothing shall be designated without a good faith belief that it
has been maintained in a confidential, non-public manner. There is good cause why
28
2354-8567
2
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 2:16-cv-03435-JGB (AFMx)
1
2
it should not be part of the public record of this case.
3.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
WAL-MART shall mark as “confidential” or “produced pursuant to
protective order” or in some similar fashion any document for which it claims
protection under this Order. The documents, things and information contained in
them or gleaned from them shall only be used, shown and disclosed as provided in
this Order. The term “confidential documents and information” as used in this
Order shall be construed to include the documents and materials so marked, and
their content, substance and the information contained in or gleaned from them.
The term shall also be construed to include any summaries, quotes, excerpts and/or
paraphrases of the documents, things or information. The designation shall be
made in good faith and shall not be made with respect to any document which is in
the public domain, such as patents, or any other document which has previously
been produced or disseminated without confidentiality protection.
4.
16
17
18
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Scope
This Order is limited to the context of pre-trial civil discovery. This Order
does not restrict dissemination of information if gained from other public sources
outside of pre-trial civil discovery.
19
20
Designating Protected Information
Any use of confidential material at trial shall be governed by the orders of the
trial judge. This Order does not govern the use of confidential material at trial.
5.
Duration
Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations
imposed by this Order shall remain in effect until WAL-MART agrees otherwise in
writing or a court order directs. Final disposition shall be deemed after (1)
dismissal of all claims and defenses in this action, with or without prejudice; and
(2) final judgment hereinafter the completion and exhaustion of all appeals,
rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this Action, including the time limits for
28
2354-8567
3
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 2:16-cv-03435-JGB (AFMx)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to applicable law.
///
6.
Disclosure of “Confidential” Information or Items
6.1
Qualified Persons. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court or permitted
in writing by the parties, access to WAL-MART’s confidential documents and
other materials, any parts thereof, any summaries or extracts thereof, as well as
matters contained therein which are produced or obtained through pre-trial
discovery shall be limited to the following “qualified persons.” The following
persons are automatically deemed “qualified person”:
a. this Court, officers of this Court, and the jury
b. counsel of record for the parties to this lawsuit;
c. those paralegals, stenographic and clerical employees who are
employed by and assisting counsel of record;
d. the parties of record and their officers, directors, employees, counsel
of record and insurers to the extent necessary to assist in preparing for
discovery, depositions, resolution, or for trial, or who are otherwise
assisting in this litigation; and
e. any expert or consultant who has been retained or specially employed
by a party in anticipation of this litigation or for trial of this case, to
the extent necessary to assist in the litigation, and who has signed a
written certification in the form set forth as Exhibit “A”; provided,
however, that no confidential documents and information shall be
disseminated to any expert or consultant:
i.
25
26
27
who is an employee of a direct business competitor of the party
producing the information; or
ii.
who is employed by a direct business competitor of the party
producing the information and who directly participates in
28
2354-8567
4
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 2:16-cv-03435-JGB (AFMx)
1
design, manufacturing, marketing, or service activities of direct
2
business competitors.
3
4
5
6
Counsel of record shall maintain such certifications for all designated
experts, and shall provide copies of the certifications upon demand to counsel for
any opposing party. Demand to one counsel of record for a party is deemed to be a
demand to all counsel of record for a party.
7
8
9
10
11
12
6.2
to the jurisdiction of this Court for purposes of enforcement of this Order.
Counsels of record are responsible for ensuring that their employees and any
experts they retain comply strictly with this Order. Violation by an employee of
counsel or by an expert retained by counsel shall be deemed a violation by counsel.
7.
13
14
15
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Timing of Challenges.
Any Party or Non-Party may challenge a
designation of confidentiality at any time that is consistent with the Court’s
Scheduling Order.
7.2
Meet and Confer. The Challenging Party shall initiate the dispute
resolution process under Local Rule 37.1 et seq.
18
19
Challenges to Claims of Confidentiality
7.1.
16
17
Jurisdiction over Qualified Persons. Each qualified person is subject
7.3
Burden of Persuasion.
The burden of persuasion in any such
challenge proceeding shall be on WAL-MART. Frivolous challenges, and those
made for an improper purpose (e.g., to harass or impose unnecessary expenses and
burdens on other parties) may expose the Challenging Party to sanctions. Unless
WAL-MART has waived or withdrawn the confidentiality designation, all parties
shall continue to afford the material in question the level of protection to which it is
entitled under WAL-MART’s designation until the Court rules on the challenge.
8.
Use of Confidential Documents and Information
8.1
Generally. Confidential documents, things and information may be
used solely in connection with this lawsuit and for no other purpose. No qualified
28
2354-8567
5
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 2:16-cv-03435-JGB (AFMx)
1
2
3
4
person who gains access to the confidential documents, things and information may
disclose them or their contents to any other person without the written stipulation of
the producing party or by order of this Court.
///
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
8.2
be used at trial or at depositions, in accordance with the following safeguards. If
confidential documents, things and information are used in depositions, all portions
of the transcript of such depositions and exhibits thereto which refer to or relate to
such confidential documents, things or information shall themselves be considered
as confidential documents. WAL-MART shall ensure that the court reporter binds
the confidential portions of the transcript and exhibits separately and labels them
“confidential.” In addition, each deponent shall be ordered that he may not divulge
any confidential documents, things or information except to qualified persons.
9.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
In this Lawsuit. Confidential documents, things and information may
Filing and Sealing.
The Parties further acknowledge that this Stipulated Protective Order does
not entitle them to file confidential information under seal. A Party that seeks to
file under seal any confidential information must comply with Civil Local Rule 795. Confidential information may only be filed under seal pursuant to a court order
authorizing the sealing of the specific confidential information at issue. If a Party's
request to file confidential information under seal is denied by the Court, then the
Receiving Party may file the information in the public record unless otherwise
instructed by the Court.
10.
Protected Material Subpoenaed or Ordered Produced in Other Litigation.
If a party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation
that compels disclosure of any information or items designated in this Action as
“CONFIDENTIAL,” that Party must:
(a) promptly notify WAL-MART in writing. Such notification shall include
28
2354-8567
6
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 2:16-cv-03435-JGB (AFMx)
1
a copy of the subpoena or court order;
2
(b) promptly notify in writing the party who caused the subpoena or order to
3
issue in the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the
4
subpoena or order is subject to this Protective Order. Such notification shall
5
include a copy of this Stipulated Protective Order; and
6
(c) cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be pursued
7
by WAL-MART whose Protected Material may be affected. If WAL-MART
8
timely seeks a protective order, the Party served with the subpoena or court
9
order shall not produce any information designated in this action as
10
“CONFIDENTIAL” before a determination by the court from which the
11
subpoena or order issued, unless the Party has obtained the WAL-MART’s
12
permission. WAL-MART shall bear the burden and expense of seeking
13
protection in that court of its confidential material and nothing in these
14
provisions should be construed as authorizing a Receiving Party in this
15
16
Action to disobey a lawful subpoena issued in another action.
11.
17
18
19
20
11.1 Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any
person to seek its modification by the Court in the future. No modification by the
Parties shall have the force or effect of a Court order unless the Court approves the
modification.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Miscellaneous.
11.2
Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this
Protective Order, no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to
disclose or produce any information or item on any ground not addressed in this
Stipulated Protective Order. Similarly, no Party waives any right to object on any
ground to use in evidence of any of the material covered by this Protective Order.
12.
Final Disposition.
At the final disposition of this action, as defined in paragraph 5, all
28
2354-8567
7
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 2:16-cv-03435-JGB (AFMx)
1
2
3
confidential documents, things and information, and all copies thereof, shall be
returned to the counsel for WAL-MART within thirty (30) days.
13.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Execution.
Facsimile copies of signature pages may be used as originals and this
Stipulated Protective Order may be executed in counterparts with the same full
force and effect. This Stipulation and Protective Order consists of nine (9) pages
and one, one-page exhibit in addition thereto, and is executed on the date set forth
below.
14.
Any violation of this Order may be punished by any and all appropriate
measures including, but not limited to, contempt proceedings and/or monetary
sanctions.
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
15
Dated: 2/27/2017
_______________________________
Alexander F. MacKinnon
United States Magistrate Judge
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2354-8567
8
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 2:16-cv-03435-JGB (AFMx)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?