Bonnie O'Connor v. Jeffrey Allan Franke
Filing
48
JUDGMENT by Judge Percy Anderson, Related to: Order on Motion to Dismiss Case, 47 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant shall have judgment in his favor against Plaintiff. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs claims are dismissed with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff takes nothing and that Defendant shall have his costs of suit. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mrgo)
1
JS-6
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
BONNIE O’CONNOR,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
CV 16-3542 PA (JCx)
JUDGMENT
v.
JEFFREY ALLAN FRANKE,
15
Defendant.
16
17
18
Pursuant to the Court’s September 23, 2016 and May 9, 2017 Orders granting the
19
Motions to Dismiss filed by defendant Jeffrey Allan Franke (“Defendant”), which dismissed
20
all of the claims asserted by plaintiff Bonnie O’Connor (“Plaintiff”) against Defendant,
21
22
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant shall
have judgment in his favor against Plaintiff.
23
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff’s claims
24
are dismissed with prejudice.
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
1
2
3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff takes
nothing and that Defendant shall have his costs of suit.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
DATED: May 9, 2017
_________________________________
Percy Anderson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?