Richard Owens v. Soto et al
Filing
33
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge John F. Walter for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 31 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Order granting Plaintiff IFP status (Dkt. No. 14) be VACATED; (2) the December 19, 2016, Order to Show Cause (Dkt. No. 29) be VACATED; and (3) Plaintiffs lawsuit be DISMISSED without prejudice as to all defendants and all claims unless, within thirty days of this Order, Plaintiff pays the full required filing fee of $400.00. (sbu)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
RICHARD OWENS,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
)
SOTO, Warden, et al,
)
Defendants.
)
_______________________________ )
NO. CV 16-3577-JFW (KS)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
18
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Second Amended
19
Complaint, all of the records herein, and the Report and Recommendation of United
20
States Magistrate Judge (“Report”). The time for filing Objections to the Report has
21
passed, and no Objections have been filed with the Court. Having completed its
22
review, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report.
23
24
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:
25
(1) the Order granting Plaintiff IFP status (Dkt. No. 14) be VACATED;
26
(2) the December 19, 2016, Order to Show Cause (Dkt. No. 29) be
27
VACATED; and
28
1
1
(3) Plaintiff’s lawsuit be DISMISSED without prejudice as to all defendants
2
and all claims unless, within thirty days of this Order, Plaintiff pays the full
3
required filing fee of $400.00.
4
5
DATED:
February 13, 2017
6
________________________________
JOHN F. WALTER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?