Gritsonis v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
Filing
36
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL by Judge Manuel L. Real: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: The First Amended Complaint is dismissed, as to all causes of action, with prejudice. Judgment is entered in favor of defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., successor by merger with Wells Fargo Bank Southwest, N.A., f/k/a Wachovia Mortgage, FSB, f/k/a World Savings Bank, FSB. Plaintiff, Nick Gritsonis will recover nothing in this action from defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. (gk)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION
10
11 NICK GRITSONIS, an individual,
Plaintiff,
12
13
CASE NO.: 2:16-cv-03610-R-KS
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL
v.
14 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; FAY
SERVICING, LLC; STATEBRIDGE
15 COMPANY, LLC; and DOES 1 through
20 inclusive,
16
Defendants.
17
[Assigned to the Hon. Manuel L. Real]
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
93000/FR1972/01545376-1
1
CASE NO. 2:16-CV-03610-R-KS
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL
1
On September 27, 2016, the Court entered an Order granting the Motion to
2 Dismiss the First Amended Complaint, filed by defendant WELLS FARGO
3 BANK, N.A., successor by merger with Wells Fargo Bank Southwest, N.A., f/k/a
4 Wachovia Mortgage, FSB, f/k/a World Savings Bank, FSB (“Wells Fargo”)
5 dismissing the First Amended Complaint in its entirety.
6
Accordingly:
7
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED:
8
1.
The First Amended Complaint is dismissed, as to all causes of action,
9 with prejudice;
10
2.
Judgment is entered in favor of defendant WELLS FARGO BANK,
11 N.A.; and
12
3.
Plaintiff, Nick Gritsonis will recover nothing in this action from
13 defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
14
15
16 DATED: October 12, 2016
HON. MANUEL L. REAL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
93000/FR1972/01545376-1
2
CASE NO. 2:16-CV-03610-R-KS
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?