Ahmad Rashad Perry v. W. L. Montgomery

Filing 26

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Fernando M. Olguin : Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing the Petition with prejudice. (dv)

1
2

O

3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

AHMAD RASHAD PERRY,

12
13
14
15

Case No. CV-16-03730-FMO (KES)

Petitioner,
v.
W.L. MONTGOMERY, Warden,

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Respondent.

16
17

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other

18

records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States

19

Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those

20

portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made.

21

The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing the
Petition with prejudice.
DATED: June 19, 2017
/s/
____________________________________
FERNANDO M. OLGUIN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE