Sandow Fred Segal LLC v. Gregorys et al

Filing 26

ORDER ON STIPULATION TO DISMISS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge Percy Anderson, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 25 . Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (mrgo)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 LARRY C. RUSS, State Bar No. 82760 Email: lruss@raklaw.com NATHAN D. MEYER, State Bar No. 239850 Email: nmeyer@raklaw.com JUSTIN E. MAIO, State Bar No. 304428 Email: jmaio@raklaw.com RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT 12424 Wilshire Boulevard 12th Floor Los Angeles, California 90025 Telephone: 310-826-7474 Facsimile: 310-826-6991 JS-6 Attorneys for Plaintiff SANDOW + FRED SEGAL, LLC RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 15 SANDOW + FRED SEGAL, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company Plaintiff, 16 17 18 19 20 21 Case No. 2.16-cv-03740-PA-JC Honorable Percy Anderson Presiding ORDER ON STIPULATION TO DISMISS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE v. GREGORY’S dba GREGORY’S SHOES and GREGORYSSHOES.COM, a California entity of unknown form, JONATHAN HARRIS, an individual, Defendants. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION TO DISMISS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER: 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT 10 11 FOR GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, THE FOLLOWING IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. This action is hereby dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); 2. This dismissal is subject to and predicated upon the settlement agreement that gave rise to this dismissal; 3. The parties further agree that this dismissal without prejudice may be converted to a dismissal with prejudice at a later date; and 4. The parties will each bear their respective costs and attorneys’ fees as incurred against one another in connection with this action. 12 13 14 SO ORDERED. 15 16 17 18 19 Dated: October 11, 2016 By: ________________________________ HON. PERCY ANDERSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION TO DISMISS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?