Erick Carpenter v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. et al

Filing 19

JUDGMENT by Judge R. Gary Klausner. IT IS ORDERED that Judgment is hereby entered in favor of SPS and against Plaintiff Erick Carpenter. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Judgment of Dismissal is hereby entered in favor of SPS for the reasons set forth in the Court's July 27, 2016 Civil Minutes Order. (bp)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION

10
11
12
13
14

Case No.: 2:16-cv-03763-RGK-JPR

ERICK CARPENTER, an individual,

Hon. R. Gary Klausner

Plaintiff,

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

v.
SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING
COMPANY, INC. AND DOES 1 through
20, inclusive,

15

State Court Case No. KC068354
Action Filed: April 11, 2016
Trial Date:
NA

Defendants.

16
17
18

This matter came before the Court on Defendant SELECT PORTFOLIO

19

SERVICING, INC.’S (“SPS”) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (the “Motion”).

20

Having reviewed the Motion, supporting evidence, and all related filings, and

21

considered the arguments made by the parties, if any, and for the reasons discussed

22

more fully in the Court’s July 27, 2016 Civil Minutes Order,

23

IT IS ORDERED that Judgment is hereby entered in favor of SPS and against

24

Plaintiff Erick Carpenter.

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
1
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
731717.1

CASE NO. 2:16-cv-03763-RGK-JPR

1

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Judgment of Dismissal is hereby entered

2

in favor of SPS for the reasons set forth in the Court’s July 27, 2016 Civil Minutes

3

Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

4
5
6

Dated: August 02, 2016

7

HON. R. GARY KLAUSNER
United States District Judge

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
731717.1

CASE NO. 2:16-cv-03763-RGK-JPR