Linda Turner v. Linda Persons et al

Filing 119

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. Based on the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefore, the release by Plaintiff of all claims and potential claims she has or may have against Defendants for the wrongful death of Decedent Kevin Turner and the violation of both Plaintiff's and Decedent's civil rights is hereby APPROVED; and IT IS ORDERED that this action be, and hereby is, DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each side to bear its own costs and attorneys fees. 118 . Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (sbou)

Download PDF
1 LAW OFFICE OF DAVID M. FELDMAN DAVID FELDMAN, SBN #179679 2 100 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 700 Santa Monica, California 90401 3 Telephone: (310) 578-7171 4 Facsimile: (310) 578-7731 Attorney for Plaintiff 5 LINDA TURNER, INDIVIDUALLY AND 6 ON BEHALF OF KEVIN TURNER (DECEASED) 7 8 9 IN THE UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 LINDA TURNER individually and as CASE NO. 2:16-cv-03781-PLA KEVIN TURNER, ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 13 Successor-in-Interest to the Estate of 14 Plaintiffs, 15 16 vs. 17 GARY CECIL, JEAN DANSEREAU, 18 BARBARA VANHOOSE, , 19 Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 PROPOSED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 1 2 ORDER 3 4 5 6 7 Based on the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefore, the release by Plaintiff of all claims and potential claims she has or may have against Defendants for the wrongful death of Decedent Kevin Turner and the 8 violation of both Plaintiff’s and Decedent’s civil rights is hereby APPROVED; and 9 IT IS ORDERED that this action be, and hereby is, DISMISSED WITH 10 PREJUDICE, each side to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. 11 12 Dated: June ___, 2018 25 13 14 15 __________________________________ Paul L. Abrams United States Magistrate 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 PROPOSED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?