Forouzesh v. Starbucks Corporation et al

Filing 23

JUDGMENT by Judge Percy Anderson, in favor of Starbucks Corporation against Alexander Forouzesh re: Order on Motion to Dismiss Case 22 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (smo)

1

JS-6

2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

ALEXANDER FOROUZESH,
individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated,

13

JUDGMENT

Plaintiff,

14
15

CV 16-3830 PA (AGRx)

v.
STARBUCKS CORPORATION

16

Defendant.

17
18

Pursuant to the Court’s August 19, 2016 Minute Order granting the Motion to

19

Dismiss filed by defendant Starbucks Corporation (“Defendant”), which dismissed all of the

20

claims asserted by plaintiff Alexander Forouzesh (“Plaintiff”),

21
22

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant shall
have judgment in its favor against Plaintiff.

23

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff’s claims

24

are dismissed with prejudice.

25

//

26

//

27

//

28

1
2
3

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff take
nothing and that Defendant shall have its costs of suit.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

4
5

DATED: August 19, 2016

_________________________________
Percy Anderson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-