Forouzesh v. Starbucks Corporation et al

Filing 23

JUDGMENT by Judge Percy Anderson, in favor of Starbucks Corporation against Alexander Forouzesh re: Order on Motion to Dismiss Case 22 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (smo)

Download PDF
1 JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 ALEXANDER FOROUZESH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 JUDGMENT Plaintiff, 14 15 CV 16-3830 PA (AGRx) v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION 16 Defendant. 17 18 Pursuant to the Court’s August 19, 2016 Minute Order granting the Motion to 19 Dismiss filed by defendant Starbucks Corporation (“Defendant”), which dismissed all of the 20 claims asserted by plaintiff Alexander Forouzesh (“Plaintiff”), 21 22 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant shall have judgment in its favor against Plaintiff. 23 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff’s claims 24 are dismissed with prejudice. 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 1 2 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff take nothing and that Defendant shall have its costs of suit. IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 DATED: August 19, 2016 _________________________________ Percy Anderson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?