Starbucks Corporation v. Hitman Glass et al

Filing 38

DEFAULT JUDGMENT 34 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Defendant James Landgraf is liable for Plaintiffs claims of trademark dilution, copyright infringement, trademark infringement, and false designation of origin. Plaintiff shall recover from Defendant James Landgraf the sum of $410,580.00 in damages.(Made JS-6. Case Terminated.). (lc) Modified on 10/21/2016. (lc).

O

1
2

JS-6

3
4
5

United States District Court
Central District of California

6
7
8
9
10
11

STARBUCKS CORPORATION d/b/a
STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY, a
Washington corporation

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15
16
17

Case No. 2:16-CV-03937-ODW(PJW)

JUDGMENT

v.
HITMAN GLASS, a California
corporation; JAMES LANDGRAF, an
individual residing in Oregon; and DOES
1 through 10, inclusive,

18

Defendants.

19
20

On June 3, 2016, Plaintiff Starbucks Corporation filed this action against

21

Defendants Hitman Glass and James Landgraf for trademark dilution, copyright

22

infringement, trademark infringement, and false designation of origin. (ECF No. 1.)

23

On August 31, 2016 the Clerk of Court entered a default against Defendant James

24

Landgraf. (ECF No. 26.) On October 20, 2016, this Court granted Plaintiff’s Motion

25

for Default Judgment against Defendant James Landgraf. (ECF No. 37.)

26

///

27

///

28

///

1

///

2

///

3

///

4

///

5
6
7

In accordance with that Order, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and
DECREED as follows:
1.

Defendant James Landgraf is liable for Plaintiff’s claims of trademark

8

dilution, copyright infringement, trademark infringement, and false designation of

9

origin;

10
11

2.

Plaintiff shall recover from Defendant James Landgraf the sum of Four

Hundred Ten Thousand Five Hundred and Eighty dollars ($410,580) in damages.

12
13

IT IS SO ORDERED.

14

October 21, 2016

15
16
17

____________________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2