Jacqueline Keller et al v. Federal Insurance Company et al

Filing 32

JUDGMENT by Judge George H. Wu. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED as follows: Judgment is entered in favor of Moving Defendants and against Plaintiffs as to each and every cause of action asserted in Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lom)

JS-6

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION

11
12

Case No. CV 16-3946-GW(PJWx)

JACQUELINE KELLER, et al.

13
Plaintiffs,

14
15
16
17
18
19

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
XXXXXXXXXX

v.
FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
et al.,
Defendants.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

1

The Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendants Federal Insurance

2

Company and Chubb INA Holdings, Inc., as successor-in-interest to The Chubb

3

Corporation, erroneously named as “CHUBB CORPORATION, also known as

4

CHUBB GROUP OF INSURANCE COMPANIES” (collectively, “Moving

5

Defendants”) [Dkt. 19] (“Moving Defendants’ Motion”), and the Motion for Partial

6

Summary Judgment of Plaintiffs Jacqueline Keller and Phillip Yaney (collectively,

7

“Plaintiffs”) [Dkt. 18] (“Plaintiffs’ Motion”), came on for hearing in Department 9D

8

of this Court on January 30, 2016. Mary E. McPherson of Tressler LLP appeared on

9

behalf of the Moving Defendants, and Jacob N. Segura of Jacob N. Segura, a Law

10

Corporation, appeared on behalf of Plaintiffs.

11

The Court, having reviewed and considered the moving papers, the

12

oppositions and replies thereto, oral argument presented by counsel for Moving

13

Defendants and Plaintiffs at the hearing, as well as all other matters presented in

14

connection herewith, hereby GRANTS Moving Defendants’ Motion in its entirety

15

and DENIES Plaintiffs’ Motion in its entirety. It appearing to the satisfaction of the

16

Court that its ruling on Moving Defendants’ Motion disposes of each and every

17

cause of action asserted in Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint, and that final

18

judgment can and should be entered, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED

19

AND DECREED as follows:

20

1.

Judgment is entered in favor of Moving Defendants and against

21

Plaintiffs as to each and every cause of action asserted in Plaintiffs’ First Amended

22

Complaint.

23

2.

Moving Defendants are entitled to recover their costs of suit herein

24

from Plaintiffs, to be addressed in a separate Application to the Clerk to Tax Costs to

25

be noticed and filed by Moving Defendants pursuant to Rule 54(d) of the Federal

26

Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 54-2.

27
28

3.

Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint is dismissed in its entirety, with

prejudice.
2

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

1

This is a final and appealable judgment between and among Moving

2

Defendants and Plaintiffs, and each of them, as to all causes of action, claims,

3

defenses and issues in this action, including those asserted in Plaintiffs’ First

4

Amended Complaint.

5

IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED.

6
7
8

Dated: February 13, 2017
George H. Wu
United States District Judge

9
10
11

OC # 61801

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT