Jacqueline Keller et al v. Federal Insurance Company et al

Filing 32

JUDGMENT by Judge George H. Wu. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED as follows: Judgment is entered in favor of Moving Defendants and against Plaintiffs as to each and every cause of action asserted in Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lom)

Download PDF
JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION 11 12 Case No. CV 16-3946-GW(PJWx) JACQUELINE KELLER, et al. 13 Plaintiffs, 14 15 16 17 18 19 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT XXXXXXXXXX v. FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT 1 The Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendants Federal Insurance 2 Company and Chubb INA Holdings, Inc., as successor-in-interest to The Chubb 3 Corporation, erroneously named as “CHUBB CORPORATION, also known as 4 CHUBB GROUP OF INSURANCE COMPANIES” (collectively, “Moving 5 Defendants”) [Dkt. 19] (“Moving Defendants’ Motion”), and the Motion for Partial 6 Summary Judgment of Plaintiffs Jacqueline Keller and Phillip Yaney (collectively, 7 “Plaintiffs”) [Dkt. 18] (“Plaintiffs’ Motion”), came on for hearing in Department 9D 8 of this Court on January 30, 2016. Mary E. McPherson of Tressler LLP appeared on 9 behalf of the Moving Defendants, and Jacob N. Segura of Jacob N. Segura, a Law 10 Corporation, appeared on behalf of Plaintiffs. 11 The Court, having reviewed and considered the moving papers, the 12 oppositions and replies thereto, oral argument presented by counsel for Moving 13 Defendants and Plaintiffs at the hearing, as well as all other matters presented in 14 connection herewith, hereby GRANTS Moving Defendants’ Motion in its entirety 15 and DENIES Plaintiffs’ Motion in its entirety. It appearing to the satisfaction of the 16 Court that its ruling on Moving Defendants’ Motion disposes of each and every 17 cause of action asserted in Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint, and that final 18 judgment can and should be entered, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED 19 AND DECREED as follows: 20 1. Judgment is entered in favor of Moving Defendants and against 21 Plaintiffs as to each and every cause of action asserted in Plaintiffs’ First Amended 22 Complaint. 23 2. Moving Defendants are entitled to recover their costs of suit herein 24 from Plaintiffs, to be addressed in a separate Application to the Clerk to Tax Costs to 25 be noticed and filed by Moving Defendants pursuant to Rule 54(d) of the Federal 26 Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 54-2. 27 28 3. Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint is dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice. 2 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT 1 This is a final and appealable judgment between and among Moving 2 Defendants and Plaintiffs, and each of them, as to all causes of action, claims, 3 defenses and issues in this action, including those asserted in Plaintiffs’ First 4 Amended Complaint. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED. 6 7 8 Dated: February 13, 2017 George H. Wu United States District Judge 9 10 11 OC # 61801 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?