Disney Enterprises, Inc. et al v. VidAngel Inc.
Filing
20
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. The Court, on its own motion, orders Counter-Claimant(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before September 1, 2016, why this action sho uld not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of Counter-Claimant(s) response. Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. (iv)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.:
Title:
CV 16-04109-AB (PLAx)
Date:
August 18, 2016
Disney Enterprises, Inc. et al v. VidAngel Inc.
Present: The Honorable
ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR., United States District Judge
Carla Badirian
N/A
Deputy Clerk
Court Reporter
Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s):
Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s):
None Appearing
None Appearing
Proceedings:
[In Chambers] Order To Show Cause Regarding Dismissal for Lack of
Prosecution
Counter-Claimant(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed, for lack of
prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack
of prosecution on its own motion).
The Court, on its own motion, orders Counter-Claimant(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before
September 1, 2016, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78
of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission
without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of
Counter-Claimant(s) response. Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause will be deemed consent to
the dismissal of the action.
Counter-Defendant(s) Disney Enterprises, Inc.; Lucasfilm Ltd LLC; Twentieth
Century Fox Film Corporation; and Warner Bros Entertainment Inc did not answer
the complaint, yet Counter-Claimant(s) have failed to request entry of default, pursuant to
Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Counter-Claimant(s) can satisfy this order by seeking entry of
default or by dismissing the complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
CV-90 (12/02)
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Initials of Deputy Clerk CB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?