Irene Triplett v. Carolyn W Colvin

Filing 24

ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. SECTION 2412(d), AND COURT COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. SECTION 1920 by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Upon Stipulation 23 , IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff is awarded attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act in the amount of $3,400.00 and court costs in the amount of $400.00. (gk)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WESTERN DIVISION 11 IRENE TRIPLETT, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 NANCY A. BERRYHILL,1 ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 15 Case No.: CV 16-4142-DMG (SKx) ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), AND COURT COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 [20] Defendant. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Nancy A. Berryhill is now the Acting Commissioner of Social Security. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Nancy A. Berryhill should be substituted for Acting Commissioner Carolyn W. Colvin as the defendant in this suit. No further action needs to be taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). 1 2 3 Based upon the parties’ Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees (“Stipulation”), and good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff is awarded attorney’s fees under the Equal Access 4 to Justice Act in the amount of THREE-THOUSAND FOUR-HUNDRED DOLLARS 5 and NO CENTS ($3,400.00), as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and Court costs in 6 the amount of FOUR-HUNDRED DOLLARS and NO CENTS, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 7 1920, subject to the terms of the Stipulation. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 11 DATED: February 17, 2017 DOLLY M. GEE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?