Sara Hassman v. Rabbinical Assembly of America et al

Filing 22

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge David O. Carter. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the Unite d States Magistrate Judge 19 . Plaintiff has filed Objections, and the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Plaintiff has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED that Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice. (kl)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 SARA HASSMAN, 13 14 15 16 17 Plaintiff, v. RABBINICAL ASSEMBLY OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV 16-4188-DOC (JEM) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff has filed Objections, and the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Plaintiff has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED that Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice. 25 26 27 28 DATED: November 6, 2017 DAVID O. CARTER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?