Curtis L. Clark v. Prudential Financial et al

Filing 42

JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II, The Court granted DefendantsMotion to Dismiss without leave to amend 41 . It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows: 1. Plaintiff Curtis L. Clark shall recover nothing from Defendants, and his claims against Defendants are dismissed on the merits and with prejudice; 2. Defendants shall recover their costs from Plaintiff as evidenced by a Bill of Costs. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc)

JS-6

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

United States District Court
Central District of California

8
9
10
11

CURTIS L. CLARK,
Plaintiff,

12

v.

13
14

Case № 2:16-cv-04214-ODW(AFM)
JUDGMENT

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL;
PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

On June 13, 2016, Plaintiff Curtis L. Clark filed a Complaint against

18

Defendants Prudential Financial and Prudential Financial, Inc. (collectively

19

“Defendants”). (ECF No. 1.) On January 11, 2017, the Court granted Defendants’

20

Motion to Dismiss without leave to amend. (ECF No. 41.)

21

///

22

///

23

///

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///

1

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows:

2

1.

3

Plaintiff Curtis L. Clark shall recover nothing from Defendants, and his

claims against Defendants are dismissed on the merits and with prejudice;

4

2.

5

Defendants shall recover their costs from Plaintiff as evidenced by a Bill

of Costs.

6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8
9

January 11, 2017

10
11
12
13

____________________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2