Michael John Stinchfield v. C. Wofford et al

Filing 31

JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh. Pursuant to the Memorandum Opinion and Order filed herewith, IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice. Related to: Memorandum & Opinion 30 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (sbou)

JS-6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

MICHAEL JOHN STINCHFIELD,

11
12
13
14

Petitioner,
v.
ROSEMARY NDOH, WARDEN, ET AL.,
Respondents.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. CV 16-4253-PJW
J U D G M E N T

15
16

Pursuant to the Memorandum Opinion and Order filed herewith,

17

IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition is denied and this action is

18

dismissed with prejudice.

19
DATED: August 14, 2017
20
21
22
23

PATRICK J. WALSH
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

24
25
26
27
28

S:\PJW\Cases-State Habeas\STINCHFIELD, M 4253\Judgment.wpd